UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Ingredion Incorporated

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois 60154

April 4, 20178, 2020

Dear Stockholder:fellow stockholders:

It is my pleasure to invite you to Ingredion Incorporated’s 2017Annual2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This year’s meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 17, 2017,20, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., local time. Due to the Westbrook Corporate Center Meeting Facility, which is located oncoronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the ground floorprotocols being imposed in response to the outbreak by federal, state and local governments, and in the interest of the annex between Towers 2health and 5well-being of our employees, stockholders and other meeting participants, we have made the Westbrook Corporate Center (neardecision that this year’s annual meeting will be virtual only. The annual meeting will be conducted via the southwesterly corner ofInternet and can be accessed by visitingwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGR2020, where you will be able to listen to the intersection of Cermak Roadmeeting live, submit questions and Wolf Road),vote online.The decision to have a virtual annual meeting this year does not represent a change in Westchester, Illinois.our stockholder engagement philosophy, and we currently expect to return to an in-person meeting next year. The annual meeting will be held solely to vote on each of the matters described in the accompanying proxy statement, which follows. We do not expect any other business will be transacted.statement.

As in previous years, we will furnish proxy materials to our stockholders primarily through the Internet. On April 4, 2017,8, 2020, we mailed to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. This notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement and 20162019 Annual Report to Stockholders and how to votesubmit your proxy or voting instructions online. The proxy statement contains instructions on how you can request a paper ore-mail copy of the proxy statement and annual report, if you received only a notice by mail, and how you can elect to receive your proxy statement and annual report electronically bye-mail if you received them by mail this year. Stockholders who have previously elected delivery of our proxy materials electronically will receive ane-mail with instructions on how to access these materials electronically. Stockholders who have previously elected to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials will receive a full paper set of these materials by mail.

Your vote is important, whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting via the Internet, and we encourage you to vote promptly. You may votesubmit your sharesproxy or voting instructions on the Internet or via a toll-free telephone number. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, you may sign, date and mail the proxy card in the envelope provided. Instructions regarding all three methods of submitting your proxy or voting instructions are contained in the proxy statement and the proxy card. Note also that if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you may votesubmit your sharesvoting instructions in accordance with your voting instruction form or notice provided by the record holder.

Thank you for your support and continued interest in Ingredion.

Sincerely,

Ilene S. GordonJames P. Zallie

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Ingredion Incorporated

5 Westbrook Corporate Center

Westchester, Illinois 60154

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Ingredion Incorporated (the “Company”) will be held atvirtually via the Westbrook Corporate Center Meeting Facility, which is located onInternet and can be accessed by visitingwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGR2020, where you will be able to listen to the ground floor of the annex between Towers 2meeting live, submit questions and 5 of the Westbrook Corporate Center (near the southwesterly corner of the intersection of Cermak Road and Wolf Road), in Westchester, Illinois,vote online. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 17, 2017,20, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

StockholdersOnly stockholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 201726, 2020, which is the record date for the annual meeting, will be entitled to vote at the meeting and at any adjournment or adjournmentspostponement of the meeting.

Due to the coronavirus(COVID-19) outbreak and the protocols being imposed in response to the outbreak by federal, state and local governments, and in the interest of the health and well-being of our employees, stockholders and other meeting participants, we have made the decision that this year’s annual meeting will be virtual only. The annual meeting will be conducted via the Internet, and you will not be able to attend the annual meeting in person. Attendance at the virtual meeting will be limited to stockholders those holding proxies from stockholdersof record, beneficial owners of shares with specified proof of ownership, and invited guests from the media and financial community. A list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be open to examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting for ten days before the meeting during ordinary business hours at the company’sCompany’s offices at 5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois 60154. In addition, the list will be available to any stockholder for examination online during the annual meeting. To access the list during the annual meeting, please visitwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGR2020 and enter the16-digit control number contained on your notice of availability,e-mail notification, voting instruction form or proxy card.

ThisThe proxy statement and our annual report to stockholders and the proxy are first being made available to stockholders on or about April 4, 2017.8, 2020.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting via the Internet, please ensure that your vote will be counted by submitting your proxy or voting instructions on the Internet or by using the toll-free telephone number, as described in the enclosedaccompanying materials. Alternatively, if you received a copy of the proxy card by mail, you may sign, date and mail the proxy card in the envelope provided. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you may votesubmit your sharesvoting instructions in accordance with your voting instruction form or notice provided by the record holder.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Michael N. Levy

Christine M. Castellano

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate

Assistant Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer

April 4, 20178, 2020

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 201720, 2020

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com.

ADMISSION TOATTENDING THE 20172020 ANNUAL MEETING VIA THE INTERNET

An admission ticket (or other proof of stock ownership) will be required for admission to the annual meeting.Only stockholders who ownowned Ingredion common stock as of the close of business on March 21, 2017 26, 2020, which is the record date for the annual meeting, will be entitled to attend the meeting. An admission ticketmeeting via the Internet. You will serve as verification of your ownership.be able to access the meeting atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGR2020 using a16-digit control number.

You must present your admission ticketWe encourage you to access the virtual annual meeting before the start time of 9:00 a.m., local time, on May 20, 2020. Please allow ample time for onlinecheck-in, which will begin at the door for admission for yourself and one guest. Seating will be8:45 a.m., local time, on a first-come, first-served basis, and you may be asked to present valid picture identification before being admitted.May 20, 2020.

The use of cameras at thedecision to have a virtual annual meeting is prohibited,this year due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak does not represent a change in our stockholder engagement philosophy, and they will not be allowed in thewe currently expect to return to an in-person meeting room, except by credentialed media. We realize that most cellular phones havebuilt-in digital cameras. While these phones may be brought into the room, the camera function may not be used at any time. No recording devices, large packages, luggage or bags will be permitted in the meeting room.next year.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ingredion Incorporated

5 Westbrook Corporate Center

Westchester, Illinois 60154

PROXY STATEMENT

General Information

In this proxy statement we refer to Ingredion Incorporated as “Ingredion,” the “company,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us.”

Why am I receiving these materials?

The Board of Directors of Ingredion Incorporated (the “Board of Directors” or the “board”) is soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “annual meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, May 17, 2017,20, 2020, and at any adjournment or adjournmentspostponement of the annual meeting. When we ask you for your proxy, we must provide you with a proxy statement and an annual report to stockholders that contain certain information specified by law. Our Board of Directors has made these materials available to most of our stockholders on the Internet or, if you have previously requested to receive paper copies or you are a participant in one of the Ingredion Incorporated Retirement Savings Plans, has delivered paper copies of these materials to you by mail, in connection with the board’s solicitation of proxies for use at our 20172020 annual meeting. Our stockholders are invited to attend the annual meeting via the Internet, and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement. In this proxy statement we refer to Ingredion Incorporated as “Ingredion,” the “company,” the “Company,” the “corporation,” the “Corporation,” “we” or “us.”

What is included in these materials?

These materials include:

If you received paper copies of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card for the annual meeting.

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials?

As in previous years, we are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily through the Internet. We are mailing to most of our stockholders a notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials (“notice of availability”) instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders receiving the notice of availability will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the notice of availability. In addition, this proxy statement contains instructions on how stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in paper form by mail or electronically bye-mail on an ongoing basis.

Why didn’t I receive a notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials?

We are providing some of our stockholders, including stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials and our stockholders who are participants in the Ingredion Incorporated Retirement Savings Plans, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a notice of availability of the proxy materials.

How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?

Your notice of availability of the proxy materials, proxy card or voting instruction form contains instructions on how to view our proxy materials for the annual meeting on the Internet.

Our proxy materials are also available on our investor relations website at http:https://www.ingredion.com.ir.ingredionincorporated.com/financial-information/sec-filings. If you received your proxy materials in the mail, you can instruct us on the website to send our future proxy materials to you electronically bye-maile-mail. on the website where you can vote and on our website. Choosing to receive your future proxy materials bye-mail will help us conserve natural resources and reduce the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. If you choose to receive future proxy materials bye-mail, you will receive ane-mail with instructions containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to receive proxy materials bye-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

How may I obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials?

Stockholders receiving a notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials in their notices. All stockholders who do not receive the notice of availability and have not elected to receive proxy materials bye-mail will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

What will the stockholders vote on at the annual meeting?

FourThe stockholders will vote on three proposals:

Will there be any other items of business on the agenda?

We do not expect any other items on the agenda because the deadlines for stockholder proposals and notices to present business at the annual meeting, including, without limitation, director nominations, have already passed. Nonetheless, in case there is anyan unforeseen need,matter or item of business to be presented or acted upon at the annual meeting, the accompanying proxy gives discretionary authority to the persons named in the proxy with respect to other matters that might be brought before the meeting. Those persons intend to vote the proxy as to such matters or items of business in accordance with their best judgment.

Who is entitled to vote?

StockholdersOnly stockholders as of the close of business on March 21, 201726, 2020, which is the record date for the annual meeting fixed by the Board of Directors (the “record date”), may vote at the annual meeting. You have one vote for each share of common stock you held on the record date, including shares:

What constitutes a quorum for the annual meeting?

AThe holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote and present or represented by proxy at the annual meeting will constitute a quorum for the annual meeting. As of the record date, 71,680,75867,038,606 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.

How many votes are required for the approval of each proposal?

Broker nonvotes.non-votes. If your shares are held by a broker, the broker will ask you how you want your shares to be voted. If you give the broker instructions, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you do not give instructions, one of two things can happen, depending on the type of proposal. For the election of directors and the advisory vote on the compensation of the company’sCompany’s “named executive officers” and the advisory vote on whether to have stockholders vote to approve, by advisory vote, the compensation of the company’s “named executive officers” every year, every two years or every three years,officers,” the broker may not vote your shares unless it has received your

specific instructions. For the vote to ratify the appointment of our

independent registered public accounting firm, the broker may vote your shares in its discretion even though you have not provided specific instructions. Accordingly, there are not expected to be any brokernon-votes with respect to Proposal 3. For other proposals, none of which are anticipated, the broker may not vote your shares. When the broker may not vote your shares, it is called a “broker nonvote.non-vote.”

Broker nonvotesnon-votes will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum but will not be counted as entitled tohave no effect on the outcome of the vote on any matter for which instructions are required.the election of directors or the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers” as disclosed in this proxy statement.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote on the proposals?

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote your shares:

How do I vote?submit proxy or voting instructions if I will not vote at the annual meeting?

If you are a stockholder of record or are holding a proxy for a stockholder of record, you may vote in personvia the Internet at the annual meeting. We will give you a ballot during the meeting. If you do not wish to vote in person or if you will not be attendingvia the Internet at the annual meeting, you may vote by proxy. You can voteBefore the annual meeting, you may submit your proxy or voting instructions by proxy on the Internet by following the instructions provided in the notice of availability of the proxy materials, or, if you received these materials electronically, by following the instructions in thee-mail message that notified you of their availability.

If you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can votemay submit your proxy or voting instructions on the Internet, by telephone or by mail by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card.

You can utilize these methods to vote:submit your proxy or voting instructions before the annual meeting:

By the Internet.Internet.You may votesubmit your proxy or voting instructions online atwww.proxyvote.com by following the instructions provided in the notice of availability of the proxy materials or, if you received these materials electronically, by following the instructions in thee-mail message that notified you of their availability, or, if you received these materials by mail, by following the instructions in the enclosed proxy card. You will need your16-digit control number contained on your notice of availability,e-mail notification or proxy card in order to vote online. Votingsubmit your instructions. Submitting proxy or voting instructions on the Internet has the same effect as votingsubmitting such instructions by mail or telephone. InternetYou may submit your proxy or voting will be availableinstructions on the Internet until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 16, 2017.19, 2020.

By telephone.telephone.You may votesubmit your proxy or voting instructions by telephone at1-800-690-6903. You will need the16-digit control number contained on your notice of availability,e-mail notification or proxy card in order to vote by telephone. VotingSubmitting proxy or voting instructions by telephone has the same effect as votingsubmitting such instructions by mail or the Internet. TelephoneYou may submit your proxy or voting will be availableinstructions by telephone until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 16, 2017.19, 2020.

By mail.mail.If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, you may votesubmit your proxy or voting instructions by signing and dating each proxy card you received and returning each of them to us in the prepaid envelope provided. Sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy. If you are signing in a representative

capacity (for example, as anattorney-in-fact, executor, administrator, guardian, trustee or the officer, agent or partner of a corporation or partnership), please indicate your name and your title or capacity. If the stock is held in custody for a minor (for example, under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act), the custodian should sign, not the minor.

CanMay I changerevoke my vote after I have voted?proxy or voting instructions before my shares are voted at the annual meeting?

YouYes, you may revoke your proxy and changeor voting instructions before your voteshares are voted at any time before the final vote at theannual meeting. You may votesubmit your proxy or voting instructions again at a later date on the Internet or by telephone or by signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date, or by attendingyou may attend the meeting via the Internet and voting in person.vote during the meeting. Only your latest Internet, telephone or written proxy submitted prior to the meeting will be counted. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting by (1) notifying the company’sCompany’s Corporate Secretary in writing or (2) delivering a later-dated proxy on the Internet or by telephone or in writing. However, your attendance at the annual meeting via the Internet will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at the meeting or specifically request in writing that your prior proxy be revoked. Any written notice revoking a proxy should be sent to Christine M. Castellano, Corporate Secretary, Ingredion Incorporated, 5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois 60154.

How do I votesubmit voting instructions for shares that are held by my bank, broker or other holder of record?

If you have shares held of record by a bank, broker or other holder of record, you may instruct your bank, broker or other holder of record to vote your shares by following instructions that the bank, broker or other holder of record provides for you. Most banks and brokers offerpermit beneficial owners of shares to submit voting instructions on the Internet, by telephone and by mail.

How do I vote at the annual meeting via the Internet?

The annual meeting will be conducted solely via the Internet. Due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, you will not be able to attend this year’s annual meeting in person?

person. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote your shares in personthrough the online voting platform at the meeting. However,If you are the beneficial owner of shares, and hold the shares in street name, you also may vote the shares you beneficially own through the online voting platform under a legal proxy from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee and are not required to take any additional action to obtain a legal proxy. Whether you hold your shares of record or in street name, please follow the instructions atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGR2020 in order to vote your shares via the Internet during the meeting. You will need the16-digit control number contained on your notice of availability,e-mail notification, voting instruction form or proxy card.

Whether you hold your shares of record or in street name, and even if you plan to attend the meeting virtually via the Internet, we encourage you to votesubmit proxy or voting instructions before the meeting on the Internet, by telephone or by mail even if you plan to attend the meeting.mail.

How will the proxies be voted?

The shares represented by all valid proxies received by Internet, by telephone or by mail will be voted in the manner specified.specified in such proxies. If you fail to indicate your voting preferences, the persons named in the proxy will vote on your behalf for election of the nominees for director listed below, for approval of the compensation of the company’s “named executive officers,” for holding a stockholders’ advisory vote to approve, by advisory vote, the compensation of the company’sCompany’s “named executive officers” every yearas disclosed in this proxy statement and for ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm.firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

Should any matter not described above be properly presented at the meeting, each of the persons named in the proxy will vote on such matter in accordance with herhis best judgment.

How do I vote my shares in the Ingredion Incorporated Stock Fund of the company’sCompany’s Retirement Savings Plans?

You may instruct the plan trustee on how to vote your shares in the Ingredion Incorporated Stock Fund on the Internet, by telephone or by mail as described above. You must provide your instruction on the Internet or by telephone no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 12, 201715, 2020, or by mail received no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 12, 201715, 2020, in order to have your shares in the Ingredion Incorporated Stock Fund voted at the annual meeting.

How many shares in the Ingredion Incorporated Stock Fund of the company’sCompany’s Retirement Savings Plans canmay I vote?

You may vote all the shares allocated to your account on the record date.

What happens if I do not instruct the plan trustee to vote my Retirement Savings PlanPlans shares?

Your shares will not be voted. The plan trustee will not vote shares held in the Retirement Savings Plans as to which it does not receive timely directions.

What does it mean if I receive more than one notice of availability or proxy card?

It means that you hold shares in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, if you votesubmit proxy or voting instructions on the Internet or by telephone, you will need to votesubmit such instructions once for each notice of availability, proxy card and voting instruction form you receive. To ensure that all your shares are voted if you received more than one proxy card, sign, date and return each card or votesubmit voting instructions once for each card on the Internet or by telephone.

Who tabulates the votes?

The votes are tabulated by an independent inspector of election.

Is my vote confidential?

As a matter of policy, proxies, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are held confidential by the company.Company. Such documents are available for examination only by any independent tabulation agents, the independent inspector of election and certain employees associated with tabulation of the vote. The identity of the vote of any stockholder is not disclosed except as may be necessary to meet legal requirements.

What should I do if I want to attend the annual meeting in person?meeting?

An admission ticket (or other proof of stock ownership)The annual meeting will be required for admissionconducted solely via the Internet. Due to the annual meeting.Only stockholders who own Ingredion common stock as of the close of business on March 21, 2017 will be entitled to attend the meeting. An admission ticket will serve as verification of your ownership.

How do I contact the Board of Directors?

Interested parties may communicate directly with any member of the Board of Directors, including the lead director,Chairman of the Board, or thenon-management directors or the independent directors, as a group, or any individual director, by writing in care of:

Corporate Secretary

Ingredion Incorporated

5 Westbrook Corporate Center

Westchester, Illinois 60154

The Corporate Secretary will collect all such communications and organize them by subject matter. All such communications will be promptly forwarded to the appropriate board committee chairman according to the subject matter of the communication, except for solicitations or other matters inappropriate for the recipient or otherwise unrelated to the company.Company. Communications addressed directly to the lead director,Chairman of the Board, thenon-management directors or the independent directors, as a group, or any individual director will be forwarded in the same manner to the lead director,Chairman of the Board, eachnon-management member of the board, each independent member of the board or the individual director, as the case may be.

Who is paying the costs of this proxy solicitation?

Ingredion is paying the costs of the solicitation of proxies. We have retained Morrow Sodali LLC, 470 West Ave., Stamford, CT 06902, a proxy soliciting firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies, for an estimated fee of $8,000 plus reimbursement of certainout-of-pocket expenses. We mustwill pay brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares held in street name certain fees associated with:

In addition to soliciting proxies by the Internet and mail, our board members, officers and employees may solicit proxies on our behalf, without additional compensation, personally, bye-mail or by telephone.

How do I submit a stockholder proposal for the 20182021 annual meeting?

Proposals for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement.Our 20182021 annual meeting is scheduled forto be held on Wednesday, May 16, 2018.19, 2021. If a stockholder intends to present a proposal pursuant to Rule14a-8 ofunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), at the 20182021 annual meeting and wishes to have the proposal included in the company’sCompany’s proxy statement for the 20182021 annual meeting, he or she must submit the proposal in writing so that we receive it by December 5, 2017,7, 2020, unless the date of our 20182021 annual meeting is more than thirty days before or after May 16, 2018,19, 2021, in which case the proposal must be received a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials for our 20182021 annual meeting. Proposals should be addressed to our Corporate Secretary, Ingredion Incorporated, 5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois 60154. Any stockholder proposal submitted for inclusion must be eligible for inclusion in our proxy statement in accordance with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Pursuant to our bylaws, stockholders may submit director nominees to be included in our annual proxy statement, known as “proxy access.” Stockholders who intend to submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2021 annual meeting must comply with the requirements of proxy access as set forth in our bylaws. The stockholder or group of stockholders who wish to submit director nominees pursuant to proxy access must deliver the required materials to the Company not less than one hundred twenty nor more than one

hundred fifty days prior to the anniversary of the date that the proxy statement was released for the prior year’s annual meeting, or if the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than thirty days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, not less than ninety days before the date of the applicable annual meeting, or, if later, the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting, whichever occurs first.

Other Proposals for Consideration at the 2021 Annual Meeting.In addition, ourby-laws bylaws provide that any stockholder wishing to present any other business or nominate directors for election at the annual meeting without including such matters in the company’sCompany’s proxy materials must give the companyCompany written notice not less than ninety nor more than one hundred twenty days in advance of the date which is the anniversary of the date of the previous year’s annual meeting, or, if the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than thirty days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, not less than ninety days before the date of the applicable annual meeting, or, if later, the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting, whichever occurs first. That notice must provide certain other information as described in ourby-laws.

Pursuant to a recent amendment to our by-laws, stockholders may also submit director nominees to be included in our annual proxy statement, known as “proxy access.” Stockholders who intend to submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2018 annual meeting must comply with the requirements of proxy access as set forth in our by-laws. The stockholder or group of stockholders who wish to submit director nominees pursuant to proxy access must deliver the required materials to the company not less than one hundred twenty nor more than one hundred fifty days prior to the anniversary of the date that the proxy statement was released for the prior year’s annual meeting, or if the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than thirty days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, not less than ninety days before the date of the applicable annual meeting, or, if later, the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting, whichever occurs first. bylaws.

There are other procedural requirements in ourby-laws bylaws pertaining to stockholder nominations and proposals. A copy of theby-laws bylaws is available online in the “Governance”“Corporate Governance” section of our investor relations website at http:https://www.ingredion.com.ir.ingredionincorporated.com/corporate-governance/highlights. Any stockholder may also receive a current copy of ourby-laws, bylaws, without charge, by writing to our Corporate Secretary.

I share an address with another stockholder and received one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?

The SEC’s rules permit us to deliver a single set of annual meeting materials to one address shared by two or more of our stockholders. This delivery method is referred to as “householding” and can result in significant cost savings with respect to holders who want to receive paper materials. To take advantage of this opportunity, we have delivered only one proxy statement and annual report to multiple stockholders who share an address, unless we received contrary instructions from the affected stockholders prior to the mailing date. This procedure saves printing and postage costs by reducing duplicative mailings. We agree to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual meeting materials, as requested, to any stockholder at the shared address to which a single copy of these documents was delivered. If you prefer to receive separate copies of the proxy statement or annual report, contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. at800-542-1061866-540-7095 or in writing at Broadridge Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Please also keep in

mind that this proxy statement and the accompanying 20162019 Annual Report to Stockholders will be published and available for viewing and copying in the “Investors”“SEC Filings” section of our investor relations website at http:https://www.ingredion.com,ir.ingredionincorporated.com/financial-information/sec-filings, in addition to being available at the site stated in the notice of availability.

If you are currently a stockholder sharing an address with another stockholder and wish to receive only one copy of future proxy statements and annual reports for your household, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions at the above telephone number or address.

Stockholders who participate in householding and request to receive paper copies of the proxy materials will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Householding will not affect dividend check mailings.

Beneficial stockholders can request information about householding from their banks, brokers or other holders of record.

Proposal 1. Election of Directors

In this Proposal 1, the Board of Directors is asking stockholders to elect to the Board of Directors the 11 director nominees who are named in this proxy statement.

The terms of all ten11 of our incumbent directors are expiring at the 2020 annual meeting. All ten of these ten directors arehave been nominated for electionre-election as directors, with each nominee to hold office for aone-year term expiring at our 20182021 annual meeting. Each director who is elected by our stockholders will hold office until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. All of the nominees standing for election are listed on pages 89 to 13,19, with brief biographies.

All of the nominees for election have consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. If, for any reason, any of the nominees cannot be a candidate for election at the annual meeting, the proxies will be voted for substitute nominees designated by the board unless it has reduced its membership priorthe board chooses to reduce the annual meeting. The board does not anticipate that anynumber of the nominees will be unavailable to serve if elected. If elected, the nominees will hold office until the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and have qualified.authorized directors.

LUIS ARANGUREN-TRELLEZ

Age — 5558

Director since May 2003

Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Executive President of Arancia, S.A. de C.V.

Mr. Aranguren-Trellez has been since September 5, 2011, the Executive President and a director of Arancia, S.A. de C.V., since September 5, 2011, and he has served as the Executive President and a director of Arancia Industrial, S.A. de C.V. since June 1, 2000. These are holding companies with interests in the food and enzyme industries, the rental of special textile rent to the hospital sector and food service and logistics, as well as energy efficiency and smart meters businesses. Arancia and Arancia Industrial are Mexican companies that are owned by Mr. Aranguren-Trellez and his brothers. Arancia Industrial was the former joint venture partner with the companyCompany in corn wet milling and refining operations in Mexico. Previously, Mr. Aranguren-Trellez served as Operations Director of CPIngredientes, S.A. de C.V., Ingredion’s Mexican subsidiary, from 1996 until 2000, and had served in various other management positions with that company and its predecessors since 1989. Mr. Aranguren-Trellez is Chairmana director of PFS de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a privateprivately held Mexican company in the food service and logistics area previously controlled by Arancia and now a joint venture with Sysco Corporation. Mr. Aranguren-Trellez is also a member of the Regional Consulting Board of Telefonos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., as well as of Banco Nacional de Mexico, S.A., the Citicorp Mexican bank subsidiary. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the University of Notre Dame and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School.

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Mr. Aranguren-Trellez should serve as a director of the Company include currently serving as Chief Executive Officer of significant privately held companies, operating and manufacturing experience and general management experience, including living and working outside the U.S., and service as a director on several privately held company boards and on severalnot-for-profit boards.

DAVID B. FISCHER

Age — 5457

Director since May 2013

Member of the CompensationAudit Committee

Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Greif, Inc.

Mr. Fischer served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of Greif, Inc. from November 1, 2011, to October 31, 2015, and as President of Greif, Inc. from October 2007 to October 31, 2015. Greif, Inc. is a manufacturer and provider of industrial packaging and services including steel, fiber, flexible, corrugated, intermediate bulk, reconditioned and multiwall containers and containerboard, and filling, packaging, industrial packaging reconditioning and land management consulting services for a wide range of industries. From 2007 to October 2011, Mr. Fischer also served as Chief Operating Officer of Greif, Inc. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Fischer served as Senior Vice President and Divisional President, Industrial Packaging & Services-Americas, which also included responsibility for Africa. He assumed additional responsibility for Australia and Asia in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Mr. Fischer serves as a director of Balchem Corporation, a manufacturer of performance ingredients and products for the food, nutritional, feed, pharmaceutical and medical sterilization industries.industries, and DoMedia Inc., a privately held technology company that operates a market forout-of-home advertising sales. Mr. Fischer is also chairman of the board andco-founder of 10x Engineered Materials LLC, a privately held materials science based company which manufactures high tech industrial abrasives. He is also serves as a past director of the followingtwonot-for-profit entities: Habitat for Humanity International and The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and the Zanmi Beni Foundation.Center. Mr. Fischer holds a Bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Purdue University.

Qualifications

ILENE S. GORDON

Age — 63

Director since May 2009

Chairman, PresidentThe specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Mr. Fischer should serve as a director of the Company include serving as the Chief Executive Officer of a public company, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including responsibility for international operations while based in the Company

Ms. Gordon has been Chairman of the Board, PresidentU.S. and Chief Executive Officer of the company since May 4, 2009. She was Presidentwhile based in Switzerland, and Chief Executive Officer of Rio Tinto’s Alcan Packaging, a multinational business unit engaged in flexible and specialty packaging, from October 2007 until she joined the company on May 4, 2009. From December 2006 to October 2007, Ms. Gordon was a Senior Vice President of Alcan Inc. and President and Chief Executive Officer of Alcan Packaging. Alcan Packaging was acquired by Rio Tinto in October 2007. From 2004 until December 2006, Ms. Gordon served as President of Alcan Food Packaging Americas, a division of Alcan Inc. From 1999 until Alcan’s December 2003 acquisition of Pechiney Group, Ms. Gordon was a Senior Vice President of Pechiney Group and President of Pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., a global flexible packaging business. Prior to joining Pechiney in June 1999, Ms. Gordon spent 17 years with Tenneco Inc., where she most recently served as Vice President and General Manager, heading up Tenneco’s folding carton business. Ms. Gordon also servesservice as a director on the boards of International Paper Company,two public companies in addition to Ingredion, the board of a global paper and packagingprivately held company and Lockheed Martin Corporation, a global security and aerospace company. She served as a director of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., an international insurance brokerage and risk management business, from 1999 to May 2013 and as a director of Essendant Inc., formerly United Stationers Inc., a wholesale distributor of business products and a provider of marketing and logistics services to resellers, from January 2000 to May 2009. Ms. Gordon also serves as Chairman of The Economic Club of Chicago and as a director of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, The Executives’ Club of Chicago and World Business Chicago. She is also a trustee of The MIT Corporation and a Vice Chair of The Conference Board. Ms. Gordon holds a Bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and a Master’s degree in management from MIT’s Sloan School of Management.on twonot-for-profit boards.

PAUL HANRAHAN

Age — 5962

Director since March 2006

Lead Director and Member of the Corporate Governance and NominatingAudit Committee

Former Chief Executive Officer of American Capital Energy & Infrastructure Management, LLCGlobeleq Advisors Limited

Mr. Hanrahan served as the Chief Executive Officer of Globeleq Advisors Limited, a leading independent power producer operating and developing power projects in Africa, from September 18, 2017, to December 31, 2019, when he assumed a board position as a nonexecutive director. Prior thereto, Mr. Hanrahan served as the Chief Executive Officer of American Capital Energy & Infrastructure Management, LLC, an investment company formed to raise, invest and manage funds in the energy and infrastructure industries, from September 2012 to December 16, 2016. He left American Capital Energy & Infrastructure Management, LLC after all its assets were sold as part of its acquisition by Ares Capital Corporation of American Capital, Ltd., a sponsor investor in American Capital Energy & Infrastructure Management, LLC. Mr. Hanrahan served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of The AES Corporation, one of the world’s leading independent power producers, from June 2002 to September 2011. He was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of The AES Corporation and President and Chief Executive Officer of AES China Generating Co., Ltd., a public company formerly listed on NASDAQ, from 1993 to June 2002. Mr. Hanrahan served as a director of The AES Corporation from June 2002 to September 2011. He also previously served on the boards of other major publicly listed utilities in Brazil, Chile and Venezuela. In 2009 Mr. Hanrahan was appointed by the White House to serve on the U.S.-India CEO forum. Mr. Hanrahan is a director of AquaVenture Holdings Limited, a global provider of water services. He is also a director of BMR Energy, a renewable energy company. He served as a director of Arch Coal, Inc., a global coal producer and marketer, from June 2012 to October 2016. He previously served as a director of Azura Power Holdings, Ltd, an electric power generation company in Nigeria;Nigeria, and GreatPoint Energy, Inc., a producer of clean,low-cost natural gas from coal, petroleum coke and biomass. Mr. Hanrahan holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School.

Qualifications

RHONDA L. JORDAN

Age — 59

Director since November 2013

Member ofThe specific qualifications and experiences the Compensation Committee

Former President, Global Health & Wellness, and Sustainability of Kraft Foods Inc.

Ms. Jordan served as President, Global Health & Wellness, and Sustainability of Kraft Foods Inc., one of the largest consumer packaged food and beverage companiesboard considered in North America and one of the largest worldwide among publicly traded consumer packaged food and beverage companies, from September 2010 to March 2012 and indetermining that role led the development of Kraft’s health & wellness and sustainability strategies and plans for that company, including marketing, product development, technology, alliances and acquisitions. Prior to being named President, Health & Wellness in September 2010, Ms. Jordan was the President of the Cheese and Dairy business unit of Kraft from January 2008 to September 2010. From 2006 to January 2008 she served as the President of the Grocery business unit of Kraft, and from 2004 to 2005 she was the Senior Vice President, Global Marketing of Kraft Cheese and Dairy. Ms. Jordan is a director of Colfax Corporation, a diversified global industrial manufacturing and engineering company that providesgas- and fluid-handling and fabrication technology products and services to commercial and governmental customers around the world under the Howden, ESAB and Colfax Fluid Handling brand names, Bush Brothers & Company, a significant, privately held branded vegetable processor, and I and Love and You, a privately held branded manufacturer of grain-free food and healthy chews and treats for pets. She also serves as a director of IES Abroad, anot-for-profit company providing study abroad programs for a consortium of U.S. colleges and universities, and the Chicago Chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in arts management from Northwestern University and a Masters of Business Administration degree from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

GREGORY B. KENNY

Age — 64

Director since March 2005

Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Former President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable Corporation

Mr. Kenny served as President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable Corporation, a Fortune 500 company, from August 2001 to June 30, 2015 and a director of General Cable Corporation from 1997 to June 30, 2015. General Cable Corporation is a manufacturer of aluminum, copper and fiber-optic wire and cable products. From 1999 to 2001 he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of General Cable Corporation; from 1997 to 1999 he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; from 1994 to 1997 he served as Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing; and from 1992 to 1994 he served as President, Consumer Products Group. Mr. Kenny is the lead director of Cardinal Health, Inc., a Fortune 21 company that improves the cost-effectiveness of healthcare, and a director of AK Steel Holding Corporation, an integrated producer of flat-rolled carbon, stainless and electrical steels and tubular products through its wholly owned subsidiary, AK Steel Corporation. Previously, Mr. Kenny servedHanrahan should serve as a director of the Cincinnati BranchCompany include formerly serving as the Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, IDEX Corporation and numerous professional andnot-for-profit organizations. Mr. Kenny holds a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from Georgetown University, a Master of Business Administration degree from George Washington Universitypublic company and a Masterprivately held company, accounting and financial experience, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including living and working outside the U.S., service as a director on the boards of Public Administration degree from Harvard University. Mr. Kenny is a memberthree public companies in addition to Ingredion and on the boards ofIndustry Week’s manufacturing hall two privately held companies and service as the lead director of fame, class of 2013.Ingredion and one other public company.

BARBARA A. KLEINRHONDA L. JORDAN

Age — 62

Director since March 2004

Chairman of the Audit Committee

Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CDW Corporation

Ms. Klein served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CDW Corporation, a direct marketer of multi-brand information technology products, from 2002 until she retired in May 2008. CDW was acquired by an entity controlled by investment funds affiliated with Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC and Providence Equity Partners in October 2007. Previously, she served as the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dean Foods Company, a food and beverage company, from 2000 to 2002 and was the Vice President and Corporate Controller of Ameritech Corporation, a telecommunications company, from 1996 to 2000. Ms. Klein is a director of Cabot Microelectronics Corporation, the leading supplier of sophisticated polishing compounds and a provider of polishing pads used in the manufacture of advanced semiconductors (chips) and rigid disks, and a director of anot-for-profit entity, the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc., the most experienced source of workers compensation insurance information, tools and services in the U.S. Ms. Klein is a member of The Chicago Network. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting and finance from Marquette University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Loyola University.

VICTORIA J. REICH

Age — 59

Director since November 2013

Member of the Audit Committee

Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Essendant Inc.

Ms. Reich served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Essendant Inc., formerly, United Stationers Inc., a wholesale distributor of business products, from June 2007 to July 2011. Prior to that, Ms. Reich spent ten years with Brunswick Corporation, a manufacturer of recreation products, where she most recently was President of Brunswick European Group from 2003 to 2006. She served as Brunswick’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2003 and as Vice President and Controller from 1996 to 2000. Before joining Brunswick, Ms. Reich spent 17 years at General Electric Company, a diversified technology, media and financial services company, where she held various financial management positions. Ms. Reich is a director of H&R Block, Inc., a provider of tax preparation and related services, and a director of Ecolab Inc., a provider of water and hygiene services and technologies for the food, hospitality, industrial and energy markets. Ms. Reich holds a Bachelor of Science degree in applied mathematics and economics from Brown University.

JORGE A. URIBE

Age — 60

Director since July 2015

Member of the Audit Committee

Former Global Productivity and Organization Transformation Officer of The Procter & Gamble Company

Mr. Uribe served as the Global Productivity and Organization Transformation Officer of The Procter & Gamble Company, the world’s largest maker of consumer packaged goods, from December 2012 to July 1, 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Uribe spent more than 30 years with Procter & Gamble, where he most recently was Group President, Latin America and Global Club, Cash and Carry Channel from August 2011 to November 2012. He served as Procter & Gamble’s Group President, Latin America from August 2010 to July 2011 and as President, Latin America from July 2004 to July 2010. Prior to that Mr. Uribe was the Marketing and Sales Vice President for Latin America for three years and Vice President for Venezuela and the Andean Region for the previous two andone-half years. Before that he held a number of positions of increasing responsibility in Switzerland, Cyprus, Malaysia, United Arab Emirates & Gulf Countries, Saudi Arabia and Colombia. Mr. Uribe is a director of General Mills, Inc., a leading global food company, Grupo Argos, a holding company in Colombia holding interests in concrete, electricity generation and transmission, coal extraction, infrastructure and real estate, and Carvajal S.A., a manufacturer of school text books, office equipment and paper products. Mr. Uribe is a director of United Way Worldwide, anot-for-profit, charitable organization. He holds a Bachelor degree in management engineering from Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Sede Medellin and a Masters of Business Administration degree from Xavier University.

DWAYNE A. WILSON

Age — 58

Director since May 2010

Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Former President, Global Health & Wellness, and Sustainability of Kraft Foods Inc.

Ms. Jordan served as President, Global Health & Wellness, and Sustainability of Kraft Foods Inc., one of the largest consumer packaged food and beverage companies in North America and one of the largest worldwide among publicly traded consumer packaged food and beverage companies, from September 2009 to March 2012, and in that role led the development of Kraft’s health & wellness and sustainability strategies and plans for that company, including marketing, product development, technology, alliances and acquisitions. Prior to being named President, Health & Wellness in September 2009, Ms. Jordan was the President of the Cheese and Dairy business unit of Kraft from January 2008 to September 2009. From 2006 to January 2008 she served as the President of the Grocery business unit of Kraft, and from 2004 to 2005 she was the Senior Vice President, Global Marketing of Kraft Cheese and Dairy. Ms. Jordan is a director of Colfax Corporation, a diversified global manufacturing and engineering company that provides fabrication technology products and services through its ESAB division and orthopedic medical devices that address injury prevention through surgical intervention and rehabilitation through its DJO division; Bush Brothers & Company, a significant, privately held branded vegetable processor; G&L Holdings, a large, privately held food ingredient and branded food product company in the U.S.; and I and Love and You, a privately held branded manufacturer of grain-free food and healthy chews and treats for pets. She also serves as a director of IES Abroad, anot-for-profit company providing study abroad programs for a consortium of U.S. colleges and universities. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in arts management from Northwestern University and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

Qualifications

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Ms. Jordan should serve as a director of the Company include her 25 years of operating, general management and marketing experience within a large, publicly held, global corporation where she most recently served as President, Global Health & Wellness, and Sustainability, and her service as a director, chairman of the compensation committee and a member of the nominating and corporate governance committee of a public company, as a director and chairman of the compensation committee of a significant, privately held company and as a director of a small privately held company.

GREGORY B. KENNY

Age — 67

Director since March 2005

Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Former President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable Corporation

Mr. Kenny served as President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable Corporation from August 2001 to June 30, 2015, and a director of General Cable Corporation from 1997 to June 30, 2015. General Cable Corporation, now part of Prysmian Cables & Systems, is a manufacturer of aluminum, copper and fiber-optic wire and cable products. From 1999 to 2001 he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of General Cable Corporation; from 1997 to 1999 he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; from 1994 to 1997 he served as Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing; and from 1992 to 1994 he served as President, Consumer Products Group. Mr. Kenny is thenon-executive chairman of Cardinal Health, Inc., a Fortune 15 company that improves the cost-effectiveness of healthcare, and a director of AK Steel Holding Corporation, an integrated producer of flat-rolled carbon, stainless and electrical steels and tubular products through its wholly owned subsidiary, AK Steel Corporation. Previously, Mr. Kenny served as a director of the Cincinnati Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, IDEX Corporation and numerous professional andnot-for-profit organizations including an ESOP, Xtek. Mr. Kenny holds a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from Georgetown University, a Master of Business Administration degree from George Washington University and a Master of Public Administration degree from Harvard University. Mr. Kenny is a member of Industry Week’s manufacturing hall of fame, class of 2013.

Qualifications

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Mr. Kenny should serve as a director of the Company include serving as the Chief Executive Officer of a public company, accounting and financial, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including responsibility for international operations while living and working outside the U.S., serving as Ingredion’s Chairman of the Board and previously as its lead director, service as a director on the boards of public companies other than Ingredion, including serving as the chairman and previously as the lead director of a Fortune 15 company, and service on the boards of numerousnot-for-profit organizations.

BARBARA A. KLEIN

Age — 65

Director since March 2004

Member of the Compensation Committee

Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CDW Corporation

Ms. Klein served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CDW Corporation, a direct marketer of multi-brand information technology products, from 2002 until she retired in May 2008. CDW was acquired by an entity controlled by investment funds affiliated with Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC and Providence Equity Partners in October 2007. Previously, she served as the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dean Foods Company, a food and beverage company, from 2000 to 2002 and was the Vice President and Corporate Controller of Ameritech Corporation, a telecommunications company, from 1996 to 2000. Ms. Klein is a director of Cabot Microelectronics Corporation, a leading supplier of consumable materials to semiconductor manufacturers and pipeline operators, and a director of anot-for-profit entity, the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc., the most experienced source of workers compensation insurance information, tools and services in the U.S. Ms. Klein is a member of The Chicago Network. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting and finance from Marquette University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Loyola University.

Qualifications

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Ms. Klein should serve as a director of the Company include her over 30 years of service in corporate financial and accounting roles, serving as the Chief Financial Officer of two public companies, as the controller of a public company, as a financial executive at other companies in a number of industries and in various stages of development, including experience with acquisitions and divestitures, service as chairman of the audit committee of Ingredion as well as of a public company in addition to Ingredion and of a significantnot-for-profit organization, her former licensure as a certified public accountant, and her qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K.

VICTORIA J. REICH

Age — 62

Director since November 2013

Chairman of the Audit Committee

Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Essendant Inc.

Ms. Reich served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Essendant Inc., formerly, United Stationers Inc., a wholesale distributor of business products, from June 2007 to July 2011. Prior to that, Ms. Reich spent ten years with Brunswick Corporation, a manufacturer of recreation products, where she most recently was President of Brunswick European Group from 2003 to 2006. She served as Brunswick’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2003 and as Vice President and Controller from 1996 to 2000. Before joining Brunswick, Ms. Reich spent 17 years at General Electric Company, a diversified technology, media and financial services company, where she held various financial management positions. Ms. Reich is a director of H&R Block, Inc., a provider of tax preparation and related services, and a director of Ecolab Inc., a provider of water and hygiene services and technologies for the food, hospitality, industrial and energy markets. Ms. Reich also serves as a director of North Valley Hospital and North Valley Hospital Foundation,not-for-profit organizations. Ms. Reich holds a Bachelor of Science degree in applied mathematics and economics from Brown University.

Qualifications

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Ms. Reich should serve as a director of the Company include her 32 years of service in corporate financial and accounting roles, serving as the Chief Financial Officer of two public companies and as a controller, her operating and general management experience, including responsibility for international operations while living and working outside the U.S., her service as chairman of the audit committee and a member of the finance committee of a public company and as chairman of the audit committee and a member of the governance committee of another public company, and her qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K.

STEPHAN B. TANDA

Age — 54

Director since August 2019

Member of the Audit Committee

President and Chief Executive Officer of AptarGroup, Inc.

Mr. Tanda has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of AptarGroup, Inc., a NYSE-listed global leader in consumer dispensing, active packaging and drug delivery solutions, since February 1, 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Tanda served as an executive managing board director at Royal DSM NV, a leading global supplier of ingredients and material solutions for the food, dietary supplement, personal care, medical device, automotive, paint, electronic andbio-material markets, and oversaw the global nutrition business as well as its pharma joint ventures and business interests in the Americas. Mr. Tanda’s career spans more than 25 years and includes living in seven countries while working in leadership roles for DuPont, a leading global manufacturer of chemicals, electronic and communication technologies, performance materials, coatings and color technologies, safety and protection materials, and agriculture and nutrition ingredients (including, without limitation, serving as President and Chief Executive Officer, The Solae Co., DuPont Nutrition and Health, and President, DuPont Protein Technologies, DuPont Nutrition and Health), Freudenberg Nonwovens Group, a privately held global manufacturer and pioneer in high performance technical textiles for a wide range of industries and applications, and Royal DSM NV. Over his career, Mr. Tanda has focused on developing local and global talent, building organizations and businesses while successfully delivering increased sales and profits, both via organic growth and via acquisitions. Mr. Tanda serves as a director of AptarGroup since he joined the Company in February 2017. He previously served as a director of Patheon NV, formerly a NYSE-listed company that provided pharmaceutical development and manufacturing services, from March 2016 until the Company was sold to Thermo Fisher Scientific in August 2017, and Semperit AG Holding, a Vienna Stock Exchange-listed manufacturer of industrial rubber and plastic products, from April 2016 to February 2017. Mr. Tanda holds a Master of Business Administration from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and holds a degree in plastics engineering from the University of Leoben, Austria.

Qualifications

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Mr. Tanda should serve as a director of the Company include currently serving as the President and Chief Executive Officer of a public company, operating, manufacturing and general management experience, including living and working outside the U.S., service as a director on the boards of two other public companies, and his qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) ofRegulation S-K.

JORGE A. URIBE

Age — 63

Director since July 2015

Member of the Compensation Committee

Former Global Productivity and Organization Transformation Officer of The Procter & Gamble Company

Mr. Uribe served as the Global Productivity and Organization Transformation Officer of The Procter & Gamble Company, the world’s largest maker of consumer packaged goods, from December 2012 to July 1, 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Uribe spent more than 33 years with Procter & Gamble, where he most recently was Group President, Latin America from July 2004 to November 2012. Prior to that Mr. Uribe was the Marketing and Sales Vice President for Latin America for three years and Vice President for Venezuela and the Andean Region for the previous two andone-half years. Before that he held a number of positions of increasing responsibility in Switzerland, Central America and the Caribbean, Cyprus, Malaysia, United Arab Emirates and the Gulf Countries, Saudi Arabia and Colombia. Mr. Uribe is a director of General Mills, Inc., a leading global food company, Grupo Argos, a Colombian multi-national holding company holding interests in cement, electricity, road and airport concessions and real estate, and Carvajal S.A., a Colombian multi-national manufacturer of packaging, paper products and education material and provider of technology and services. Mr. Uribe previously served as a director of United Way Worldwide, anot-for-profit, charitable organization. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in management engineering from Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Sede Medellin and a Master of Business Administration degree from Xavier University.

Qualifications

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Mr. Uribe should serve as a director of the Company include his more than 33 years of operating and general management experience and sales and marketing experience, including multi-regional and multi-country responsibility for international operations while living and working outside the U.S. within a larger, publicly held, global corporation, and his service as a director on the boards of two public companies in addition to Ingredion, on the board of a privately held company and on the board of a significantnot-for-profit, charitable organization.

DWAYNE A. WILSON

Age — 61

Director since May 2010

Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Former Senior Vice President of Fluor Corporation

Mr. Wilson served as Senior Vice President of Fluor Corporation, reporting to the Chairman and CEO on key initiatives of strategic importance to the corporation, from June 23, 2014, to June 10, 2016. Fluor is one of the world’s largest publicly owned engineering, procurement, construction, maintenance and project management companies. Mr. Wilson previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, the managing and operating contractor of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site including the Savannah River National Laboratory, from October 1, 2011, to June 22, 2014. Fluor is one of the owners of Savannah River Nuclear Solutions. Mr. Wilson previouslyalso served from February 2007 to September 2011 as Group President, Industrial of Fluor Corporation. Fluor is one of the owners of Savannah River Nuclear Solutions. Mr. Wilson previously served as President, Fluor Mining & Minerals from 2003 to 2007, President, Fluor Commercial and Industrial Institutional from 2002 to 2003, Vice President & Executive Director, Offices of the Chairman and Chief Operating Officer from 2001 to 2002 and in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility from 1980 to 2001. Mr. Wilson is a director of AK Steel Holding Corporation, an integrated producer of flat-rolled carbon, stainless and electrical steels and tubular products through its wholly owned subsidiary, AK Steel Corporation. He is also a director of South Carolina Hospital Company, anot-for-profit entity. Mr. Wilson was a trustee of the Fluor Foundation and is a past director of the Urban League of Upstate South Carolina. He served as Chairman of the Engineering and Construction Contracting Association from 2002 to 2006. Mr. Wilson is also a National Association of Corporate Directors Fellow. Mr. Wilson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in civil engineering from Loyola Marymount University.

Qualifications

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Mr. Wilson should serve as a director of the Company include his more than 36 years of project management, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including responsibility for international operations while based in the U.S. within a large publicly held corporation where he served as Group President of a significant international business unit and most recently served as Senior Vice President, his experience serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of the managing and operating contractor of a significant U.S. Department of Energy site, including a National Laboratory, and serving as a director of one public company in addition to Ingredion and serving as a director of anot-for-profit organization.

JAMES P. ZALLIE

Age — 58

Director since September 2017

President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company

Mr. Zallie has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 1, 2018. Prior thereto he served as Executive Vice President, Global Specialties and President, Americas from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017. Mr. Zallie previously served as Executive Vice President, Global Specialties and President, North America and EMEA from January 6, 2014, to December 31, 2015. Prior to that Mr. Zallie served as Executive Vice President, Global Specialties and President, EMEA and Asia-Pacific from February 1, 2012, to January 5, 2014. Mr. Zallie previously served as Executive Vice President and President, Global Ingredient Solutions from October 1, 2010, to January 31, 2012. Prior thereto, Mr. Zallie served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Starch business from January 2007 to September 30, 2010. Mr. Zallie worked for National Starch for more than 27 years in various positions of increasing responsibility, first in technical, then marketing and then international business management positions. National Starch LLC was acquired by the Company in October 2010. Mr. Zallie also serves as a director of Northwestern Medicine North Region, anot-for-profit organization. Mr. Zallie served as a director of Innophos Holdings, Inc. from September 2014 to April 2018. Mr. Zallie earned a Bachelor’s degree in food science from Pennsylvania State University, and both a Master’s degree in food science and technology and a Master’s degree in finance from Rutgers University.

Qualifications

The specific qualifications and experiences the board considered in determining that Mr. Zallie should serve as a director of the Company include currently serving as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ingredion, serving as the Chief Executive Officer of a large business unit of a large public company, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including living and working outside the U.S., and service as a director of a public company in addition to Ingredion and of anot-for-profit organization.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the nominees for election as directors.

The Board and Committees

The business and affairs of the companyCompany are conducted under the direction of its Board of Directors.

Under our certificate of incorporation the Board of Directors may have not fewer than seven or more than 17 members. The Board of Directors is currently comprised of 1011 directors, nine10 of whom are outside(non-employee) directors.

In the interim between annual meetings, the The board has the authority under the company’sby-lawsCompany’s bylaws to increase or decrease the size of the board and to fill vacancies. In connection with the appointment of Mr. Tanda to the board in August 2019, the number of authorized directors was increased to 11 from 10 directors. Mr. Tanda was identified to the board as a director candidate by a third-party search firm.

The experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the board to concludeconsidered in determining that the nominees standing for election should serve as directors are discussed above in their biographies and belowbiographies. See the discussion under the heading“The Board and Committees—Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.Committee”” for a description of the board’s criteria for selecting director nominees.

The Board of Directors has determined that each of the following nine10 directors satisfies the definition of independent director includingunder the definitionCompany’s Corporate Governance Principles, which incorporate the director independence standards established by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) applicable to members of the Compensation Committee:for board membership: L. Aranguren-Trellez, D. B. Fischer, P. Hanrahan, R. L. Jordan, G. B. Kenny, B. A. Klein, V. J. Reich, S. B. Tanda, J. A. Uribe and D. A. Wilson. In addition, the Board of Directors determined that the members of the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee satisfied the additional independence requirements established by NYSE rules for membership on those committees. Under the rules of the NYSE, a director is not considered to be independent unless the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the director has no material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries). In addition, the NYSE rules stipulate that certain relationships preclude a director from being considered to be independent.

The board held seven11 meetings in 2016.2019. Each director attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of the board and the committees of the board on which he or she served during 2016. As a group,2019 during the directors’ meeting attendance averaged 98 percent for the year.period of such service.

We encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Last year, allAll of our directors attended theour 2019 annual meeting.meeting of stockholders.

Non-management directors meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of management. Executive sessions are held in conjunction with each regularly scheduled meeting of the board.“Non-management” directors are all those who are not company officers and may include directors who are not “independent” by virtue of the existence of a material relationship with the company.Company. At least annually the independent directors meet in executive session without the presence of management or any other directors. The Chairman of the Board presides over executive sessions ofnon-management directors.

The board does not impose term limits, as thisit believes term limits could unnecessarily interfere with the continuity, diversity, developed experience and knowledge and the long-term outlook the board must have. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider a director’s tenure in making a recommendation to the board as to whether a director should be nominated forre-election. In making such recommendation the committee will consider such factors as effectiveness and productivity of the director, the need for retaining an experienced director and othersother factors identified during the board self-evaluation process.

Board policy requires outsidenon-employee directors to retire no later than the annual meeting following their 72nd birthday. Employee directors, including the Chief Executive Officer, are required to retire from the board upon their retirement or other cessation of service as an employee, unless the board determines otherwise in unusual circumstances. Board policy requires executive officers to retire at age 65.

The company’s Corporate Governance Principles; Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Other Executives Involved in Financial Reporting; and Policies on BusinessCode of Conduct are available in the “Governance”“Corporate Governance” section of the company’sour investor relations website at http:https://www.ingredion.com.ir.ingredionincorporated.com/corporate-governance/highlights.

Board Oversight of Risk Management Processes. The board regularly devotes time during its meetings to review and discuss the significant risks facing the companyCompany and the steps that the companyCompany takes to monitor, manage and mitigate such exposures. The full board directly discusses strategic, competitive, economic, geopolitical and political risks.

Significant risks (including, without limitation, risk factors) are identified in the company’sCompany’s disclosures in its Annual Report

on FormForm 10-K and updates, if any, and forward-looking statements disclosures, and are prioritized by management and discussed with the board and the appropriate committees of the board in the exercise of their oversight roles. The board conducts a comprehensive annual review of the company’sCompany’s risk management processes with input from management and all relevant board committees, and the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer report to the board quarterly on risk management matters.

Consistent with the NYSE’s corporate governance standards, the Audit Committee is the board committee with primary responsibility for oversight of the company’sCompany’s risk management profile and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The charter of the Audit Committee states that the responsibility of the committee with respect to risk assessment is to review policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, to discuss the company’sCompany’s major risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor such exposure, and to review, on an annual basis, a report prepared by the General Counsel on litigation in which the companyCompany is involved and to provide the report to the full board. In the exercise of that responsibility, the Audit Committee discusses with management the major financial, legal and regulatory compliance risk exposures facing the companyCompany and the appropriate responses to such risks. The Audit Committee considers financial risk management policies and exposures relating to commodity prices including corn and energy, foreign exchange rates, interest rates and financial derivatives and reviews insurable risk management policies. The Audit Committee also reviews the company’sCompany’s capital structure, access to capital markets, liquidity, credit availability and related matters. Furthermore, the Audit Committee has oversight with respect to the status of corporate security, the security for the Company’s electronic data processing, information systems and the general security of the Company’s people and assets.

In addition to the Audit Committee, the other committees of the board consider risk in connection with their oversight of the matters within the scope of their charters. The Compensation Committee oversees human resource and labor matters as well as executive and director compensation issues and considers whether the company’sCompany’s compensation plans, policies and practices encourage excessive or inappropriate risk taking.taking that would have a material adverse effect on the Company. Furthermore, the Compensation Committee considers the effect of the company’sCompany’s compensation and benefit programs in regard to the competitive risks faced by the company.Company. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee addresses potential risks that could result from the absence of independence or diversity on the board, potential conflicts of interest, environmental and quality matters and security and safety issues. Each committee provides regular reports on its reviews to the full board with respect to the risk assessment and risk management matters within the scope of its responsibilities.

Board Leadership. I. S. Gordon currently serves as ourBoard policy and the Company’s bylaws allow flexibility to separate or consolidate the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Ms. Gordon’s twoOfficer, as the Board, from time to time, may determine to be best for governance and effective Board and Company functioning. If the positions are consolidated, then the independent directors shall appoint a Lead Director on an annual basis for so long as the positions are consolidated. G.B. Kenny, one of our independent directors, has served as ournon-executive Chairman of the Board since August 1, 2018. His three predecessors also served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and her serving as such was a term of the letter of employment with respect to her employment.Officer. The board believes that thisevaluated the leadership structure with an independent lead director is the one that best meets the company’sCompany’s and stockholders’ needs based on the individuals available and circumstances as they exist atexisted following the present time. We believe combining these roles provides clarityprevious Chief Executive

Officer’s retirement and determined that the appointment of Mr. Kenny as to who is responsible for the strategic visionnon-executive Chairman of the company and accountability in terms of who is responsible for executing that strategy. We believe that offering the combined role makes it easier to recruit the highest qualified persons. We also believe the combined role facilitates prompt responses to changing business conditions.Board was advisable.

The board has adopted Corporate Governance Principles which are available in the “Governance”“Corporate Governance” section of our investor relations website at http:https://www.ingredion.com.ir.ingredionincorporated.com/corporate-governance/highlights. These Corporate Governance Principles are designed to promote effective functioning of the board’s activities, to ensure that we conduct our business in accordance with the highest legal and ethical standards and to enhance stockholdershareholder value. We believe thatseek under our Corporate Governance Principles to ensure that strong, independent directors continue to effectively oversee our management and provide vigorous oversight of how we address key issues relating to strategy, risk and integrity. As described in our Corporate Governance Principles, these measures include the appointment by our independent directors of an independent director to act as lead director.

Our lead director is P. Hanrahan, who most recently served as the Chief Executive Officer of American Capital Energy & Infrastructure Management, LLC. The lead director is appointed annually by and from the

company’s independent directors. The lead director oversees the board’s governance processes, including board evaluations, Chief Executive Officer succession planning and other governance-related and oversight matters. The responsibilities of the lead director include presiding at meetings of the Board of Directors in the absence of the Chairman of the Board and presiding at executive sessions conducted without management, except for meetings where executive performance and compensation are discussed, which are presided over by the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The lead director serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman of the Board, provides direct feedback to the Chairman of the Board on a variety of matters discussed in the executive sessions without management and serves as an informal communication link between the directors and management. The lead director oversees that the board discharges its responsibilities and helps to manage the boundaries between board and management responsibilities. He or she also works with the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee regarding matters to be included on the board agendas and the informational needs associated with those agendas and presentations and approves the agendas, meeting schedules and information provided to the board. The lead director works with the Chairman of the Board to ensure that the board works in an independent, productive fashion and is alert to its obligations to our stockholders. He or she works with the Chairman of the Board to ensure that board meetings are conducted in such a manner as to allow adequate time and opportunity for appropriate discussion of matters brought before the board. The lead director has the authority to call meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of the independent directors. The lead director assumes those other responsibilities which the independent directors may designate from time to time and is available as deemed appropriate by the board for consultation and direct communication with stockholders. We believe that this structure recognizes that in most cases one person should speak for and lead the company and board, but also that an independent lead director with substantial authority helps ensure effective oversight by an independent board.

Committees of the Board. The board currently has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Each of these committees operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the board. These charters are available in the “Governance”“Corporate Governance” section of our investor relations website at http:https://www.ingredion.com.ir.ingredionincorporated.com/corporate-governance/highlights.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors, as “independent”“independent director” is defined under the rules of the NYSE.NYSE, including the additional independence requirements under SEC rules specific to Audit Committee membership. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” as required by the rules of the NYSE. The board has determined that B. A. Klein,V. J. Reich, the Chairman of the committee, and V. J. Reich, meetmeets the legal requirements of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules.

This committee assistsThe primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee are to:

Members of the Audit Committee are B. A. Klein (Chairman), V. J. Reich (Chairman), D. B. Fischer, P. Hanrahan and, J. A. Uribe.since his appointment to the board on August 19, 2019, S. B. Tanda. This committee held ten10 meetings during 20162019 and has furnished the report appearing on page 60.63.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors, as “independent”“independent director” is defined under the rules of the NYSE. Each ofNYSE, including the membersadditional independence requirements specific to Compensation Committee membership.

The primary responsibilities of the Compensation Committee is also a“non-employee director” as that term is defined under Exchange ActRule 16b-3 and an “outside director” as that term is defined in U.S. Treasury Regulation§1.162-27(3).

This committee:are to:

Our Compensation Committee, together with our other independent, outside,non-employee directors, reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluates our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and, together with our other independent, outside,non-employee directors, establishes our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, based on the committee’s evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance.

The corporate goals and objectives are developed by our management, consistent with our business strategy, and approved by the board. Management recommends base salaries and short- and long-term incentive awards for our executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer, based on external market information and internal equity. Our Compensation Committee reviews these recommendations and approves the base salaries and short- and long-term opportunities for the executive officers of the company other than our Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves compensation under equity-based plans for our executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer.

Our Compensation Committee retains an independent consultant to advise it with respect to incentive plan design, external market information and other compensation matters. The independent consultant generally attends meetings of the committee and also communicates with the committee outside of meetings. Our Compensation Committee has instructed the independent consultant to:

The Compensation Committee selected and directly retained the services of Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC, an independent executive compensation consulting firm, as to its compensation decisions for 2016.2019. Pearl Meyer & Partners did not provide any other services to the companyCompany and worked with the company’sCompany’s management only on matters for which the Compensation Committee is responsible. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer & Partners pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules and concluded that no conflict of interest existed that would prevent Pearl Meyer & Partners from serving as an independent consultant to the committee. The work of Pearl Meyer & Partners in 20162019 did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Pearl Meyer & Partners generally attends meetings of the committee and also communicates with the committee outside of meetings. Our Compensation Committee meets with our Chief Executive Officer annually to reviewhas instructed the performance of our executive officers. This meeting includes anin-depth review of our executive officers’ performance and our succession plans. The same review is presented to the board each year. Similarly, the Compensation Committee reviews the Chief Executive Officer’s performance and meetsindependent consultant to:

Our Chief Executive Officer generally attends meetings of the Compensation Committee by invitation of the committee.committee, except for meetings in which the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation is being considered.

In 2019, the Compensation Committee delegated authority to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer to award up to $2.5 million inoff-cycle long-term incentive plan grants, which are intended to be used to recruit and retain new senior level talent for the Company. In 2019, this authority was used to grant a total of $1.63 million inoff-cycle grants of restricted stock units.

The members of the Compensation Committee are D. A. Wilson (Chairman), D. B. Fischer and R. L. Jordan.Jordan (Chairman), B. A. Klein and J. A. Uribe. This committee held five5 meetings during 2016.2019.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors, as “independent”“independent director” is defined under the rules of the NYSE. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the composition of the board and the tenure of its members at least annually to help determine the number and experience of directors required. The primary responsibilities of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are to:

This committee recommends

Director Nomination Criteria. The company retains a professional third-party search firm to help identify and facilitate the screening and interview process for potential director candidates. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee maintains, with the approval of the board, formal criteria for selecting director nominees. Candidates for director are identified for the contributions they can make to the deliberations of the board and their ability to represent impartially all of the company’sCompany’s stockholders and are considered regardless of race or gender.

In addition to other considerations, all potential nominees are expected to have and all our current directors have:

The above attributes are expected to be maintained by board members as a condition of their ongoing membership to the board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the makeup of the board and the tenure of its members at least annually to help determine the number and experience of directors required.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has also established the following additional criteria as an aid in the selection of potential director candidates. The weight given to any particular item may vary based on the committee’s assessment of the needs of the board, and not all criteria may be applicable to each vacancy.

Similarly, these criteria, in whole or in part, may be modified or waived by the Corporate Governance and

Nominating Committee in connection with a particular vacancy or as otherwise deemed appropriate by the committee. Candidates should have all or a majority of the following important or desired attributes:

In addition to these minimum requirements and desired attributes, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will also evaluate whether the candidates’ skills and experience are complementary to the existing board members’ skills and experience as well as the board’s need for operational, management, financial, international, technological or other expertise and diversity in a broad sense. The search firm identifies and screens the candidates, performs reference checks, prepares a biography for each candidate for the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to review and assists in establishing interviews. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee members interview candidates that meet the criteria and select those that it will recommend to the board for nomination. The board considers the nominees and selects those who best suit the needs of the board for nomination for election or appointment to the board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the board consider the composition of the entire board and the entire range of diversity in the broadest sense (age, gender, ethnicity, geography and personal experience) in determining who best suits the needs of the board. We do not have a formal diversity policy, but we have historically had a diverse board.

Our At this time our board members have a desirable mixincludes three women, two men of backgrounds, skills and experiences. They are all financially literate and share the personal attributesHispanic descent, both of effective directors described above. Below are some of the specific experiences and skills of the ten nominees for election as directors.

Luis Aranguren-Trellez

Mr. Aranguren-Trellez’s experience includes currently serving as Chief Executive Officer of significant private companies, service as a director on several privately held company boards and on severalnot-for-profit boards, operating and manufacturing experience, general management experience and living and workingwhom live outside the U.S.

David B. Fischer

Mr. Fischer’s experience includes serving as the Chief Executive OfficerUnited States, and one man of a public company, operating and manufacturing and general management experience, including responsibility for international operations while based in the U.S., and service as a director on the boards of two public companies other than Ingredion and on severalnot-for-profit boards.

Ilene S. Gordon

Ms. Gordon’s experience includes currently serving as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ingredion, serving as the Chief Executive Officer of a large business unit of a large public company, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including living and working outside the U.S., and service as a director on several public company boards and on severalnot-for-profit boards.

Paul Hanrahan

Mr. Hanrahan’s experience includes serving as the Chief Executive Officer of a public company, serving as the Chief Executive Officer of a private company, service as a director on the boards of three public companies in addition to Ingredion and on the boards of two private companies, accounting and financial experience, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including living and working outside the U.S.

Rhonda L. Jordan

Ms. Jordan’s experience includes 25 years of operating, general management and marketing experience within a large, publicly held, global corporation where she most recently served as President, Global Health & Wellness, and Sustainability. She serves as a director, chairman of the compensation committee and as a member of the nominating and corporate governance committee of a public company, as a director and chairman of the compensation committee of a significant, privately held company and as a director of a small privately held company.

Gregory B. Kenny

Mr. Kenny’s experience includes serving as the Chief Executive Officer of a public company, accounting and financial, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including responsibility for international operations while based in the U.S., and service as a director on the boards of public companies other than Ingredion, including serving as the lead director of a Fortune 21 company, and on the boards of numerous not-for-profit organizations.

Barbara A. Klein

Ms. Klein’s experience includes serving as the Chief Financial Officer of two public companies, as the controller of a public company, as a financial executive at other companies in a number of industries and in various stages of development, including experience with acquisitions and divestitures, and service as chairman of the audit committee of a public company in addition to Ingredion and of a significantnot-for-profit organization. She is a certified public accountant. Ms. Klein is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) ofRegulation S-K.

Victoria J. Reich

Ms. Reich’s experience includes 32 years of service in corporate financial and accounting roles, serving as the Chief Financial Officer of two public companies, and as a controller, and operating and general management experience, including responsibility for international operations while living and working outside the U.S., and service as chairman of the audit committee and a member of the finance committee of a public company and as chairman of the audit committee and a member of the safety, health and environment committee of another public company. Ms. Reich is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) ofRegulation S-K.

Jorge A. Uribe

Mr. Uribe’s experience includes more than 30 years of operating and general management experience and sales and marketing experience, including multi-regional and multi-country responsibility for international operations while living and working outside the U.S., within a larger, publicly held, global corporation and service as a director on the boards of two public companies in addition to Ingredion, on the board of a private company and on the board of a significant not-for-profit, charitable organization.

Dwayne A. Wilson

Mr. Wilson’s experience includes more than 36 years of project management, operating and manufacturing, sales and marketing and general management experience, including responsibility for international operations while based in the U.S., within a large publicly held corporation where he served as Group President of a significant international business unit and most recently served as Senior Vice President. His experience also includes serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of the managing and operating contractor of a significant U.S. Department of Energy site, including a National Laboratory, and serving as a director of one public company in addition to Ingredion.African-American descent.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider qualified candidates for director nominees suggested by our stockholders. Stockholders can suggest qualified candidates for director nominees by writing to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary, at Ingredion Incorporated, 5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois 60154. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee intends to evaluate candidates proposed by stockholders in the same manner as other candidates.

In addition, ourby-laws bylaws provide that candidates for director may be nominated at the annual meeting (without including such nomination in the company’sCompany’s proxy materials) if the nominating stockholder gives the companyCompany written notice not less than ninety nor more than one hundred twenty days in advance of the date which is the anniversary of the date of the previous year’s annual meeting, or, if the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than thirty days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, not less than ninety days before the date of the applicable annual meeting, or, if later, the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting, whichever occurs first. That notice must provide certain other information as described in ourby-laws. bylaws.

Pursuant to a recent amendment to our by-laws,bylaws, stockholders may also submit director nominees to be included in our annual proxy statement, known as “proxy access.” Stockholders who intend to submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 20182021 annual meeting must comply with the requirements of proxy access as set forth in our by-laws.bylaws. The stockholder or group of stockholders who wish to submit director nominees pursuant to proxy access must deliver the required materials to the companyCompany not less than one hundred twenty nor more than one hundred fifty days prior to the anniversary of the date that the proxy statement was released for the prior year’s annual meeting, or if the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than thirty days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, not less than ninety days before the date of the applicable annual meeting, or, if later, the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting, whichever occurs first.

Members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are G. B. Kenny (Chairman), L. Aranguren-Trellez and P. Hanrahan.D. A. Wilson. This committee held five4 meetings during 2016.2019.

Director Ownership Guidelines

Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that within five years of his or her election to the board, a director should acquire and hold a number of shares of the company’sCompany’s common stock that from time to time has a market value equal to a minimum of five times the dollar amount of the cash portion of his or her annual board retainer. We count direct and indirect ownership of our common stock, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and phantom stock units, but do not include stock options in determining whether the ownership targets are satisfied. As of December 31, 2016,2019, all of the directors either exceeded their stock ownership targets or were within the five-year compliance window in which to meet those ownership targets. I. S. Gordon,J. P. Zallie, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is subject to an ownership requirement of six times herhis annual base salary, and he is within the five-year compliance window in which she has satisfied.to meet that ownership target.

Director Compensation

The objective of our compensation program for ournon-management directors is to:

In order to determine the appropriate director compensation level, we use the same compensation comparator group of companies used in determining executive officer compensation, as described on page 36. The compensation comparator group was selected using companies that were broadly similar in revenue scope to the Company. Not only does the Company use our compensation peer group, but also broader,size-adjusted general industry and index benchmarks. Generally, we position pay with a median range relative to the market which helps ensure directors are paid fairly and the Company can attract qualified and diverse talent to the board. In addition, we pay a majority portion of directors’ pay in equity. This equity and share ownership guidelines further align interests with stockholders.

The following sets forth the individual components of our outside director compensation in 2016. Effective January 1, 2016,2019.

Each of the annual boardforegoing retainers is payable in quarterly installments on the first day of each calendar quarter during 2020. The stock portion of the retainer was increased from $200,000 to $210,000, with the additional amount to be paidis issued in common stock andin the additionalamount of the applicable retainer divided by the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on the first day of a fiscal quarter, or if that day is not a day on which the NYSE is open for trading, on the lead director was increased from $15,000 to $20,000.immediately preceding day the NYSE is open for trading.

I. S. Gordon,J. P. Zallie, our ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer, whose compensation is included in the Fiscal 2019 Summary Compensation Table below, did not receive any additional compensation for serving as a director.

The annual retainers are intended to compensate our outside directors at levels comparable to those paid by similarly sized companies. The Compensation Committee and the board believe these to be appropriate levels in terms of the responsibilities borne by the directors and the market for director compensation.

$110,000 of each retainer paid in 2016 was paid in stock and the other $100,000 was paid in cash. Directors are permitted to defer all or a portion of their retainers into restricted stock units under our Stock Incentive Plan that are deferred until after the director’s termination of service from the board. All directors are reimbursed for board and committee meeting expenses, but no meeting attendance fees are paid in addition to the annual retainers.

The following table summarizes the compensation earned by our directors other than I. S. GordonJ. P. Zallie for service during 2016.2019.

on the first day of the fiscal quarter, or if that day is not a day on which the NYSE is open for trading, on the immediately preceding day the exchange is open for trading. Theinto restricted stock units (and phantom stock units issued prior to 2005) earn dividend equivalents. The restricted stock units and dividends earned thereon are not subject to vesting but cannot be transferred until a date not less than six months after the date of the director’s termination of service from the board at which time the units will be settled by delivery of shares of common stock. Shares of common stock are granted in advance on the first business day of each fiscal quarter equal to the amount of the retainer paid in stock divided by the closing price of a share ofunder our common stock on the NYSE on the first day of the fiscal quarter, or if that day is not a day on which the NYSE is open for trading, on the immediately preceding day the exchange is open for trading.Stock Incentive Plan.

Restricted stock units have been valued at the grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (FASB ASC Topic 718). See notes 2 and 11 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 contained in our Annual Report on Form10-K for a statement of the assumptions made with respect to the valuation under FASB ASC Topic 718. Shares of common stock have been valued at the closing price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on the first day of the applicable fiscal quarter, or if that day is not a day on which the NYSE is open for trading, on the immediately preceding day the exchange is open for trading. Restricted stock units are granted in advance on the first business day of each fiscal quarter equal to the amount of the retainer deferred divided by the closing price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on the first day of the fiscal quarter, or if that day is not a day on which the NYSE is open for trading, on the immediately preceding day the exchange is open for trading. The restricted stock units (and phantom stock units issued prior to 2005) earn dividend equivalents. The restricted stock units and dividends earned thereon are not subject to vesting but cannot be transferred until a date not less than six months after the date of the director’s termination of service from the board at which time the units will be settled by delivery of shares of common stock. Shares of common stock are granted in advance on the first business day of each fiscal quarter equal to the amount of the retainer paid in stock divided by the closing price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on the first day of the fiscal quarter, or if that day is not a day on which the NYSE is open for trading, on the immediately preceding day the exchange is open for trading.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The calculation of beneficial ownership of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock presented in the following tables is made in accordance with SEC rules. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of shares of common stock if that person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of the shares or the power to dispose or direct the disposition of the shares. Beneficial ownership as of any date includes any shares as to which a person has the right to acquire voting or investment power as of that date or within 60 days thereafter through the exercise of any stock option or other right or the vesting of any phantom stock unit or restricted stock unit, without regard to whether such right expires before the end of such60-day period or continues thereafter. If two or more persons share voting power or investment power with respect to specific shares, all of such persons may be deemed to be beneficial owners of such shares.

The following table shows, as of December 31, 2016,2019, all persons or entities that the companyCompany knows are beneficial owners of more than five percent of the company’sCompany’s issued and outstanding common stock.

The following table shows, as of March 26, 2020, information based on filings with the SEC and our records regarding the beneficial ownership of the company’sCompany’s issued and outstanding common stock as of March 21, 2017, of by:

Includes shares of company common stock that may be acquired within 60 days of March 21, 2017,26, 2020, through the exercise of stock options granted by the companyCompany in the following amounts: I. S. Gordon, 475,420; J. C. Fortnum, 76,629; J. P. Zallie, 71,143;163,385; J. D. Gray, 48,369; J. Kokke 16,259; C.34,627; E. Adefioye, 12,371; J. M. Castellano, 36,914;Bawcom, 0, and for all directors and executive officers as a group, 793,237.369,284.

Includes shares of the company’s common stock subject to restricted stock awards in the following amounts: for each of L. Aranguren-Trellez and B. A. Klein, 888 shares and reinvestment of dividends on those shares; and for all directors and executive officers as a group, 1,776 shares. The shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Aranguren-Trellez and Ms. Klein were granted to these directors as part of their annual retainers, and reinvested dividends on these shares are vested but are restricted as to transfer until termination of service from the board. Holders of restricted stock are entitled to vote those shares prior to vesting.

Includes 1,1414,766 shares of the company’s common stock held in the Ingredion Incorporated Stock Fund of our Retirement Savings PlanPlans by all directors and executive officers as a group.

Fractional amounts have been rounded to the nearest whole share.

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section provides information concerning our compensation programs in which our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our three most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer (“named executive officers”) participated in 2016.2019. The named executive officers are all based in the U.S. The compensation discussion and analysis is organized as follows:

Executive Summary

We are a leading global manufactureringredients solutions provider. We turn corn, tapioca, potatoes, grains, fruits, and supplier of starchvegetables into value-added ingredients and sweetener ingredients to a range of industries, including packagedbiomaterials for the food, beverage, brewing and industrial customers.

2016 Business Performance and Executive Pay Highlights

We achieved net sales of $5.70 billion in 2016. Our diluted earnings per common share in 2016 increased by 18.9% to $6.55 compared to $5.51 in 2015, while adjusted diluted earnings per common share increased by 21.3% to $7.13 compared to $5.88 in 2015. The increase in earnings per share was due primarily to significantly improved operating income in the North America, and to a lesser extent, in the Asia Pacific and Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) regions, as compared to 2015.¹ Operating income was improved primarily due to a better price/product mix in both our specialty and core ingredients, acquisition-related growth and reduced costs resulting from our global optimization efforts. These positive items were partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange and difficult macroeconomic conditions in South America.other industries.

2016 Executive PayCorporate Governance Highlights

2019 Business Performance and Executive Pay Highlights

We achieved net sales of $6.21 billion in 2019. Our diluted earnings per common share in 2019 decreased by 0.6% from $6.17 in 2018 to $6.13 in 2019. Adjusted diluted earnings per common share in 2019 decreased by

3.9% from $6.92 in 2018 to compared to $6.65 in 2019.¹ The decrease in earnings per share was due primarily to foreign exchange impacts and higher raw material and production costs, partially offset by improved price mix.

Executive Pay Highlights

Overview of Compensation Philosophy and Programs

Purpose and Structure

A well-structured executive compensation strategy, like a well-structured business strategy, requires clarity and balance. We need to address many important business variables and time frames in our compensation programs. Among the most important variables that we must manage are:

Our compensation programs are intended to balance these reinforcing (and sometimes competing) objectives. We believe our programs and related pay opportunities allow us to achieve these objectives in a prudent and effective way. Our executive compensation structure is straightforward, competitive in the marketplace and has a strong emphasis on performance. We believe it is one that shareholdersstockholders can understand and support.

Our compensation structure for our named executive officers for 20162019 included the following broad elements:

This structure is simple and comprehensive, providing:

Performance

Our pay programs are aligned with competitive practice and our performance. We are committed to continuing to manage the companyCompany in a prudent manner for long-term success. We believe we are providing the right incentives to our management for them to do so.

In making decisions with respect to pay for our named executive officers for 2017,2020, our Compensation Committee took into accountconsidered thesay-on-pay vote at our 20162019 annual meeting. In light of the 95.9%93.1% vote in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers, we did not change our compensation plans as a result of thesay-on-pay vote. Our programs for 20172020 are similar to those for 2016.2019.

We continue to evaluate our compensation programs and practices to ensure we incorporate best practices in executive compensation and consider modifications to our programs to support our business strategies and provide an appropriate balance of risk and reward.

Philosophy and Process

Our Compensation Committee establishes our executive compensation philosophy. Our executive compensation programs are approved by our Compensation Committee based on recommendations by management and advice from an independent compensation consultant and are administered by our Human Resources Department. Our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer make recommendations concerning base salary, short- and long-term incentive compensation and plan design for executive compensation (other than their own) to our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee (and, with respect to the Chief Executive Officer, the independent directors) approves all forms of compensation, related design provisions and performance goals for our named executive officers.

We are committed to maximizing shareholder value and dedicated to attracting and retaining the necessary talent to accomplish this objective. Our compensation philosophy is designed to directly align the interests of shareholdersstockholders and employeesexecutives through compensation programs that will reward employeesexecutives for performance that builds long-term shareholder value.

The objectives of our compensation programs are to:

To meet our objectives, elements of compensation are based on the following three fundamental principles.

A Substantial Portion of the Named Executive Officers’ Compensation Will Be Performance-Based. Our executive compensation programs are designed to motivate our executive officers to maximize shareholder returns by achieving growth and profitability goals. Our programs provide this motivation in a number of ways.

A Substantial Portion of Named Executive Officer Compensation Will Be Delivered in the Form of Equity Awards. The Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of total target compensation should be delivered in the form of long-term equity incentives in order to align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders.stockholders. In 2016, 35%2019, 50% of the equity compensation provided to our named executive officers was delivered in the form of performance shares, 40%25% in the form of nonqualified stock options and 25% in the form of restricted stock units. These allocations are unchanged from 2018. These awards in combination focus executives on the creation of shareholder value over the long term and permit named executive officers to accumulate ownership in the company.Company.

Like awards earned under the Annual Incentive Plan, performance shares are earned based on the achievement of performance goals recommended by management and approved by the Compensation Committee (and in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the

independent members of the Board of Directors.directors). No performance shares are earned if threshold performance goals are not achieved. Stock options have no realizable value at the time of grant. Named executive officers will only realize value from stock options if our share price appreciates above the exercise price, which is the closing price of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock units have a value tied to the stock price.

Our Compensation Program for Named Executive Officers Is Designed to Enable Us to Attract and Retain First-Rate Executive Talent. We believe that shareholdersstockholders are best served when we can attract and retain talented executives with compensation packages that are competitive. Therefore, in general we target base salary and annual cash compensation (base salary plus target short-term incentives) and long-term incentive compensation opportunities for the named executive officers at the 50th percentile based on executives with similar responsibilities among a comparator group of companies. However, actual pay opportunities can vary somewhat (above or below) this market reference point based on experience, performance, retention concerns and overall expertise in the role. We prepare market benchmarking on the basis of pay opportunities, that is, “target” and grant date values of compensation. We use target/grant date values in our market analyses because earned compensation (as contrasted with target) is entirely a function of performance. Our objective is to deliver competitive target compensation opportunities. Management provides the Compensation Committee with information regarding compensation practices of the compensation comparator group of companies to assist the Compensation Committee in understanding the external market. In 2016, thisThis market data was provided to management by Aon Hewitt and reviewed by the Compensation Committee and by its advisor, Pearl Meyer & Partners. The compensation comparator group used for 20162019 compensation decisions consisted of the following 3025 companies:

We compete for talent with a variety of companies in the U.S. and elsewhere. Accordingly, since our executive talent is likely to come from a variety of industries, the Compensation Committee decided that the comparator group should similarly reflect a robust cross-section of companies and industries. Consequently, a comparator group was developed that was based on companies that provide data to the Aon Hewitt database and which were broadly similar in revenue scope (between $3.7$3.1 billion and $9.5$11.0 billion in annual revenues). The median annual revenue of this group was $5.6 billion. Aon Hewitt applied regression analysis where appropriate to account for differences in size (i.e., revenues) of the companies in the 20162019 comparator group in estimating the market value of each compensation element, a common analytical convention. The median annual revenue of this group was $6.5 billion.

There were a number ofno changes into the 20162019 compensation comparator listgroup when compared to the 2015 list. Three companies were acquired and their revenues fell below the median revenue among Ingredion’s benchmark peer2018 group, (Chiquita Brands International, Inc. acquired by Cutrale Group and Safra Group; MeadWestvaco Corporation acquired by Rock-Tenn Company; and Lorillard, Inc. acquired by Reynolds American Inc.). In

addition, seven companies were removed from the peer groupother than Dr. Pepper Snapple became Keurig Dr. Pepper due to their having a primarily domestic operating footprint (Essendant Inc., Hanesbrands Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., W.W. Grainger, Inc., Graphic Packaging Holding Company, Masco Corporation and Weyerhaeuser Company). The following two companies were added to the comparator group: Darling Ingredients Inc. and Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.its acquisition by Keurig Green Mountain during July 2018.

We determine all elements of compensation annually at the same time in order to consider the relationships between all of the compensation elements as well as to assess the appropriateness of the total compensation package for each named executive officer. To accomplish this, we review the strength of our financial performance, the named executive officers’ positions and levels of responsibility, internal comparisons, individual performance and historical grant levels, as well as the competitive market data for the compensation comparator group.

Elements of Compensation

As summarized above, our compensation program has five components: base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentive compensation, benefit programs broadly available to employees and a limited number of perquisites. Each element is addressed in the context of competitive conditions and internal comparisons. The Compensation Committee annually reviews each component of compensation including performance metrics and objectives to determine whether they remain properly aligned. Accordingly, there may be changes from year to year in the metrics or other plan design elements we use to measure performance and as the basis for earning the components of compensation.

Base Salary: We target base salaries at the 50th percentile (actual salaries are adjusted for relative experience for the position) relative to executives with similar responsibilities of the compensation comparator group of companies.group. The specific named executive officer’s salary varies based on the level of his or her responsibility, experience, time in position, internal equity considerations and individual performance. Salaries are reviewed annually. All salary actions with respect to named executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, are recommended by our Chief Executive Officer and reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. Our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations are made at the conclusion of our performance review process. Our performance review process requires our Chief Executive Officer to evaluate the other named executive officers’ performance and contributions against objective metrics and success driversleader imperatives and to assign a performance rating. This rating system is used for all salaried employees. Based on these ratings our Chief Executive Officer makes salary recommendations considering the named executive officers’ time in the position and the salary-50th50th percentile salary for the corresponding position in the compensation comparator group.

In 2016,2019, the Chief Executive Officer recommended salary increases for all of the other named executive officers, and the Compensation Committee approved totalsuch salary increasesincreases. The Compensation Committee recommended the 2019 salary increase for the executive officers including the Chief Executive Officer.Officer, and the independent directors approved such salary increase. The increases for our named executive officers averaged 6.5%, which included promotional increases. Excluding promotional increases, the average was 4.2%4.8%.

Annual Incentive Plan: Our Annual Incentive Plan is our short-term incentive cash compensation program for executive officers, including the named executive officers. This plan was approved by our shareholdersstockholders in 2015.

Since its inception, our Annual Incentive Plan has fostered and supported ourpay-for-performance philosophy by providing direct incentives to achieve specific financial goals. These goals are based on financial goals for the companyCompany recommended by management and approved by our Board of Directors. These plan goals are intended to align performance with our shareholders’stockholders’ interests. Earned annual incentives are based on performance relative to thepre-established financial goals and personal objectives.

The Compensation Committee approves a cash, short-term incentive target opportunity for each named executive officer, other than the Chief Executive Officer, expressed as a percentage of base salary. The independent directors approve the cash, short-term incentive target opportunity for the Chief Executive Officer, which is also expressed as a percentage of base salary. For 2016,2019, the target awards for the named executive

officers ranged from 65% to 125%130% of base salary depending on the named executive officer’s position, as shown in the table on page 33.40 Incentive targets are established by the Compensation Committee in part based on market data and in part based on our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations concerning short-term incentive target awards for specific named executive officers (other than herself)himself). Ms. Gordon’s 2016Mr. Zallie’s 2019 target was established based on market data and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the independent members of the Board of Directors.

Management recommended and the Compensation Committee (and, with respect to the Chief Executive Officer, the independent directors) approved the performance measures, goalstargets and weightings with respect to the performance goals as shown in the table below. The Compensation Committee (and, with respect to the Chief Executive Officer, the independent directors) approved each performance measure for the following reasons: EBITDA because it serves as a foundation for our growth and, as a result, shareholder value; operating working capital (specifically defined as cash conversion cycle) because it is a key financial metric; Cost Smart savings to align the named executive officers’ payouts with the Company’s cost saving program, and personal objectives because these objectives are important priorities for each individualnamed executive officer to achieve strategic initiatives. Mr. Zallie’s and Mr. Kokke’s goals included a regional EBITDA goalsgoal for the regional operationsregion for which they werehe was responsible in order to provide an incentive for superior performance of those operations.that region. The Compensation Committee (and the independent directors, with respect to the Chief Executive Officer’s EBITDA goal) exercised its discretion to adjust the 2019 EBITDA results for a total of $28 million to excludeone-time costs related to: restructuring/impairment costs associated with our Cost Smart SG&A Program, closure of our Lane Cove, Australia production facility, and costs associated with our Cost Smart cost of sales program; acquisition and integration costs related to Western Polymer; and other matters including the Brazilian indirect tax credit. These adjustments were determined to be appropriate from the EBITDA target level originally established because these events were outside of the ordinary course of business and excluding theseone-time and project related net costs allowed management to monitor performance of the ordinary course of business on a comparable basis year over year.

Weightings Assigned in 20162019 to Each Performance Objective under the

Annual Incentive Plan for the Named Executive Officers

Scales developed for each metric permit participants in our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) to earn from 0% up to 200% of their annual incentive targets based on achievement from 88% to 115% of the adjusted EBITDA goal, and achievement of an operating working capital goal from 0% for 64.772.4 days outstanding to 200% for 54.662.4 days outstanding.outstanding and Cost Smart savings from 0% for $16.0 million to 200% for $38.9 million in cumulative 2019end-of-yearrun-rate SG&A savings targets.

Our Board of Directors approves corporate financial goals and objectives for the company.Company. The Compensation Committee, together with the company’s other independent directors reviewsreview and approves corporateapprove the individual personal goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation in light of those corporate financial goals and objectivesobjectives. The Compensation Committee does the same for the company. named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer.

The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with the company’sCompany’s other independent directors, evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives. The Compensation Committee discusses the evaluation with the other independent directors and recommends compensation for the Chief Executive Officer to the independent directors, who approve the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, including base salary and short- and long-term incentive awards.

To be eligible to receive an incentive payment for a performance period, a named executive officer must (i) be an employee of the companyCompany on the last day of the performance period, or have terminated employment during the performance period due to retirement, disability or death, and (ii) have been employed by the companyCompany more than six months of the performance period. A named executive officer who is eligible to receive an incentive payment for a performance period, but who was not actively employed during the entire

performance period, will receive a prorated payment determined in accordance with rules approved by the Compensation Committee. Annual incentive awards for each performance period are to be paid within two andone-half months after the end of theone-year performance period.

The following tables set forth our financial performance goals established for each named executive officer for 20162019 as well as the actual results achieved.

Summary of 20162019 Financial Goals and Actual Results under the

Annual Incentive Plan for the Named Executive Officers

Executive Annual Incentives

Payout Percentage Detail—20162019

Executive Annual Incentives

Target, Maximum and Actual Awards—20162019

Annual incentives paid for 2016 were determined based upon achievement of goals set for corporate and regional financial results including EBITDA, operating working capital and personal objectives. The Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to adjust the 2016 EBITDA results to offset expenses of $3.0 million for the acquisition of TIC Gums Incorporated, expenses of $10.8 million related to the outsourcing of our information technology (“IT”) function and severance expenses of $2.2 million for the closing of our Port Colborne, Ontario, Canada plant.

For 2016, the performance goals for each of the named executive officers were recommended by the Compensation Committee and reviewed and approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors. These goals were based upon financial goals for the company recommended by management and reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.

The personal objectives component represented 25%20% of each named executive officer’s potential award opportunity. The personal objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers were recommended by the Compensation Committee and reviewed and approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors.directors. The personal objectives for the named executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, were recommended by the Chief Executive Officer to the Compensation Committee and approved by the Compensation Committee.

Ms. Gordon’sMr. Zallie’s personal objectives were focused on revenue and cost synergies and delivery of growth. In particular, herhis goals were weighted as follows:

The personal objectives of the other named executive officers were aligned with Ms. Gordon’sMr. Zallie’s personal objectives and focused on those same key areas in varying levels of emphasis and weighting.

At the end of the year, each named executive officer submitted a written self-appraisal. For the named executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, the appraisalsself-appraisals were reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer. The self-appraisal for the Chief Executive Officer was reviewed by the Compensation Committee.independent directors. These reviews considered completion of objectives and the quality of work performed and incorporated an element of judgment in assigning individual levels of achievement. A maximum 200% payout on the personal objective component was possible for exceptional achievement.

Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of the individual personal objectives and actual achievements for Ms. Gordon and upon Ms. Gordon’sall named executive officers other than Mr. Zallie, Mr. Zallie’s recommendations for the other named executive officers, and the Board of Directors’ review of Mr. Zallie’s personal objectives, the following achievement percentages were assigned for personal objectives: 145.0% for Ms. Gordon, 140.0% for Mr. Fortnum, 137.5%126.25% for Mr. Zallie, 125.0%131.25% for Mr. Gray, 105% for Mr. Kokke, and 180.0%150% for Ms. Castellano.Adefioye and 111.25% for Ms. Bawcom.

Our Chief Executive Officer can recommend to the Compensation Committee an adjustment to the amount of the Annual Incentive Plan award earned by any other named executive officer (positively or negatively) based on herhis judgment of that individual’s performance and/or herhis judgment of the degree of difficulty of the performance goal. In 2016,2019, the Chief Executive Officer did not recommend any adjustments to named executive officer Annual Incentive Plan awards under this provision. Furthermore, the Compensation Committee can adjust the total amount earned and calculated in accordance with the metrics described above from 0% to 150% based

on its determination of the relative strength or weakness of an individual’s performance. As a result, an outstanding performer can have his or her total bonus payment increased by 50%; conversely, the bonus can be reduced incrementally to $0 for an unsatisfactory performer. No such adjustments were made under this provision for 2016.

Long-term Incentive Compensation: The principal purpose of our long-term incentive compensation program is to align the rewards to executives with the creation of shareholder value. For our Chief Executive Officer, the grant date value of target long-term incentive compensation comprised 69%70% of 2019 total 2016 target compensation (base salary plus target short- and long-term incentive compensation). For our other named executive officers, the grant date value of target long-term incentive compensation comprised from 41%43% to 56%50% of their 2019 total 2016 target compensation. We feel this provided an appropriate balance between shorter- and longer-term compensation and fixed and variable components. In 2016,2019, we awarded long-term incentives to our executive officers in the form of performance shares, nonqualified stock options, performance shares and restricted stock units granted pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan. Our goal was to provide awards such that we delivered approximately 40%50% of the grant date fair value of the long-term incentive award in the form of nonqualified stock options, 35%performance shares, 25% in the form of performance sharesnonqualified stock options, and the remaining 25% in the form of restricted stock units. We used these allocations among performance shares, stock options performance shares and restricted stock units to provide a balance of compensation based on absolute stock price growth and superior relative performance-based shareholder return. We continue to evaluate the appropriate mix of long-term incentive compensation vehicles in comparison to the market to best support our long-term business strategy.

Stock Options. We determined For the February 2016 grant of nonqualified2020 grants, the respective weightings for performance shares, stock options, by converting 40% of the targeted long-term incentive compensation value for each named executive officer to a number ofand restricted stock options using an estimated Black-Scholes option value. Stock options were granted to eligible management employees, and the exercise price of such options was established on February 2, 2016. All of these options granted to our named executive officers are nonqualified stock options withten-year terms that vest inone-third increments on the first three anniversaries of the date of the grant. In the event of a retirement (defined as age 65, age 55 with ten years of service or age 62 with five years of service) one year after grant date, these options will continue to vest.

We make long-term incentive grants at the Compensation Committee’s first meeting each year, typically in early February, and at the same time other elements of compensation are determined so that we can consider all elements of compensation simultaneously.units remain unchanged.

Performance Shares.Shares: In 2014, 20152017 and 2016,2018, performance shares comprised 35% of the targeted long-term incentive compensation value, and in 2019 performance shares comprised 50% of the targeted long-term incentive compensation value. Performance shares awarded in 2019 will be earned, if at all, based on two equally weighted metrics: adjusted Return on Invested Capital, a ratio used to assess a company’s efficiency at allocating capital under its control to profitable investments which is calculated by dividing adjusted operating income, net of tax, by average current and prior year total net debt and equity, and our relative total shareholder return (“TSR”)TSR, as defined below, relative to our performance share peer group for a three-year cycle. The performance sharesThese metrics are intended to focus our executive officers on achieving critical multi-year goals, in particular, delivering superior shareholder returns relative to a comparator group. We believe that over time investors will choose our stock if they believe it will perform at least perform as well as a relevant group of peers and with strong expectations that we might outperform those peers. In addition, we believe that over time investors will choose our stock if we consistently achieve an adjusted return on invested capital in excess of our stated performance targets. The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the design of the performance shares, including performance metrics, to ensure the grants continue to be aligned with maximizing shareholder returns by achieving growth and value-generation goals. To further promote executive share ownership and shareholderstockholder alignment, vested performance shares are paid in common stock. No dividends are earned on any performance shares prior to the stock payment.

As with prior years, forFor performance shares awarded in 2016,2019, we set the relative TSR target award at the 55th50th percentile of the performance share peer group described below because we wanted to reward for above-average performance in our long-term incentive plan.below. TSR is defined for purposes of the performance shares as the sum of (a) change in stock price (ending stock price minus starting stock price) plus (b) dividends paid divided by beginning stock price. Beginning stock price is the average of the daily average prices as reported on the NYSE for each of the 20 trading days immediately prior to the first day of the performance period. Ending stock price is the average of the daily average prices as reported on the NYSE for each of the last 20 trading days of the performance period. The daily average prices are the average of the high and low prices as reported on the NYSE for one share of common stock on the date of determination. Dividends paid were the total of all dividends paid on one share of common stock during the applicable calendar quarter(s) during the performance period, with dividends treated as though they were reinvested at the end of each calendar quarter based on the stock price at the end of each calendar quarter.

Performance shares are earned based on our relative percentile ranking with respect to TSR for members of our performance share peer group.group as well as adjusted return on invested capital. The performance/reward scale for the 20162019 grant is as follows:

The performance share peer group for the TSR metric for the performance shares granted in 20162019 consisted of Ingredion and the 1823 companies listed below.

This performance share peer group was updated from the same as the onegroup used for 2018 grants. Nutrien is the prior two years, except fornew name of the removalcompany formed after Potash Corporation of Sigma-Aldrich Corporation and Mead-Westvaco Corporation, which were excluded due to corporate transactions. Saskatchewan Inc. merged with Agrium Inc. In addition, Naturex S.A. was removed after its acquisition by Givaudan SA.

In trying to construct an optimal custom comparator group, the following criteria or “filters” were utilized:

The performance share peer group was utilized for this program rather than the compensation comparator group because we believe investors are more likely to consider the stocks of these companies as alternatives to an investment in our stock than the companies in the compensation comparator group, in part because their business operations are more similar to ours. We believe that the compensation comparator group is more representative of industries from which we may attract talent. Therefore, we use itthe compensation comparator group to determine competitive compensation levels. We believe the use of two separate groups of companies is appropriate and not uncommon given the different purposes for comparison.

Results of 2014-20162017-2019 Performance Awards. Relative TSR for thisthe3-year performance cycle ending in 2019 was at the 100^th13th percentile. Consequently, 200%0% of the target number of performance shares granted in February 20142017 were earned. TSR was used because it is a direct measure of the value delivered to shareholdersstockholders relative to other comparable investments. The performance/reward scale for the 2014-20162017-2019 cycle established a payout scale with a 40th percentile requirement for a threshold performance payout of 50%, a 55th percentile for target performance payout of 100%, and an 80th percentile requirement for a maximum performance payout of 200%.

Stock Options. We determined the February 2019 grant of nonqualified stock options by converting 25% of the targeted long-term incentive compensation value for each named executive officer to a number of stock options using an estimated Black-Scholes option value. Stock options were granted to eligible management employees, and the exercise price of such options was established on February 8, 2019. All of these options granted to our named executive officers are nonqualified stock options withten-year terms that vest inone-third increments on the first three anniversaries of the date of the grant. In the event of a retirement (defined as age 65, age 55 with ten years of service or age 62 with five years of service) one year or more after grant date, these options will continue to vest.

We make long-term incentive grants at threshold, targetthe Compensation Committee’s first meeting each year, typically in early February, and maximum levels wasat the same as for the 2016-2018 cycle shown above.time other elements of compensation are determined so that we can consider all elements of compensation simultaneously.

Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock units represent the right to receive a share of common stock upon vesting. Restricted stock units are granted to align the interests of named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders.stockholders. They promote retention of critical executive talent. They also help balance the named executive officers’ long-term incentive compensation mix to minimize risk taking. Finally, they result in the issuance of a lesser amount of shares to provide an equivalent amount of compensation compared to stock options. We determined the February 20162019 grants by converting 25% of the targeted long-term incentive compensation value for each named executive officer to a number of restricted stock units using the closing price of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock units granted to the named executive officers in February 20162019 vest on the third anniversary of the date of the grant. The restricted stock units vest on a pro rata basis in the event of death or disability. The restricted stock units will continue to vest in the event of retirement (defined as age 65, age 55 with ten years of service or age 62 with five years of service) more than one year after grant date. As of each dividend payable date, additional restricted stock units equivalent to the value of the dividend are credited to the award. The additional restricted stock units carry the same terms and conditions as the underlying award.

Retirement and Other Benefits:Benefits. We also provide benefits such as medical, dental and life insurance and disability and accidental death and dismemberment coverage to each U.S.-based named executive officer. These benefits are also provided to all eligible U.S.-based employees. Eligible employees, including the named executive officers, can purchase additional life, dependent life and accidental death and dismemberment coverage as part of their active employee benefits. In addition, all salaried employees in the U.S. are eligible to participate in our Retirement Savings PlanPlans and, subject to certain service requirements, our Cash Balance Pension Plan and our Retiree Health Care Spending Accounts (“RHCSA”). Mr. Fortnum and eleven other current employees who were participating in our legacy Executive Life Insurance Plan that was established by our former parent company prior to our becoming an independent public company are provided with split-dollar life insurance. This plan has been frozen.

Cash Balance Plan. Our Cash Balance Plan is a defined benefit qualified pension plan which is available to all U.S., salaried employees hired before January 1, 2015. Accounts of participants in the Cash Balance Plan accrue pay credits based on years of service and monthly interest credits using a rate equal to a specified amount above the interest rate on short-term U.S. Treasury notes. Pay credits are calculated as a percentage (3% to 10%) of a salaried employee’s eligible compensation (defined as base salary, overtime and earned Annual Incentive Plan award). The pay credit percentage is determined by the employee’s years of service and reaches and remains at 10% after 35 years of service. Due to a recent plan change, credit for service, waswhich is frozen at 2017 levels for purposes of calculating the pay credit percentage.Thepercentage. The value of a participant’s account at retirement is paid out either as a life or a joint and survivor

annuity or in an optional form, such as a lump sum if certain funding conditions are met. The Cash Balance Plan provides for a three-year vesting period. All of the named executive officers other than Mr. KokkeZallie and Mr. Gray participate in the Cash Balance Plan.

Retirement Savings Plan. Our Retirement Savings Plan is atax-qualified 401(k) savings plan that offers U.S., salaried employees the opportunity to contribute up to 75% of their eligible compensation on either abefore-tax orafter-tax basis. The company matches 100% of employee contributions up to the first 6% of eligible compensation contributed. Employee contributions are fully vested upon contribution. Company contributions are vested over three years of qualified employment with the company.

Mr. Kokke participates in the Ingredion Incorporated Third Country National Cash Balance Plan. The plan is a defined benefit qualified pension plan which is available to certain employees who are not working in their country of origin. Accounts of participants in the Third Country National Cash Balance Plan accrue pay credits based on years of service and monthly interest credits using a rate equal to a specified amount above the interest rate on short-term U.S. Treasury notes. Until his transfer to the United States, Mr. Kokke received pay credits under the plan. Pay credits are calculated as a percentage (3% to 10%) of an employee’s eligible compensation (defined as base salary, overtime and earned Annual Incentive Plan award). The pay credit percentage is determined by the employee’s years of service and reaches and remains at 10% after 35 years of service. The value of a participant’s account at retirement is paid out in a lump sum. The Third Country National Cash Balance Plan provides for a three-year vesting period.

Ms. Adefioye and Ms. Bawcom do not participate in the Cash Balance Plan.

Retirement Savings Plan. Our Retirement Savings Plan is atax-qualified 401(k) savings plan that offers U.S., salaried employees the opportunity to contribute up to 75% of their eligible compensation on either abefore-tax orafter-tax basis. The Company matches 100% of employee contributions up to the first 6% of eligible compensation contributed. Employee contributions are fully vested upon contribution. Company contributions are vested over three years of qualified employment with the Company. Because Mr. Kokke, Ms. Adefioye and Ms. Bawcom do not participate in the Cash Balance Plan, they each receive an additional Company contribution of 3% of eligible compensation contributed to their respective Retirement Savings Plan accounts.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Certain of our U.S.-based eligible employees, including all the named executive officers, other than Mr. Kokke, are entitled to participate in our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). The purpose of this nonqualified, unfunded plan is to (a) permit certain key executives to defer receipt of a portion of current compensation, including short- and long-term incentive payments, until a later year, (b) provide participants and their beneficiaries with the amount of retirement income that is not provided under the Cash Balance Plan or the Retirement Savings Plan by reason of statutory limits on eligible compensation undertax-qualified plans and (c) preserve the opportunity for executives to continue to defer compensation that was deferred under previously maintained plans.

To the extent that an employee’s annual retirement income benefit under the Cash Balance Plan exceeds the limitations imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, additional benefits may be provided bythrough our nonqualified SERP throughvia a Cash BalanceMake-up Account to which we contribute the amounts that we would contributehave contributed to the Cash Balance Plan absent those statutory limitations. All of the named executive officers other than Mr. KokkeZallie and Mr. Gray participate in Cash BalanceMake-up Accounts. Mr. Kokke, Ms. Adefioye and Ms. Bawcom do not participate in these accounts.

Participants are entitled to participate in Annual Deferral Accounts and Savings PlanMake-up Accounts under the nonqualified SERP. To the extent that benefits are limited under the Retirement Savings Plan due to statutory limits on compensation and deferral undertax-qualified plans, participants are permitted to defer compensation underthrough the SERP. WeIn addition, we make matching contributions on voluntary contributions to the Savings PlanMake-up Accounts in the amount that mirror our contributionswe would have contributed to the Retirement Savings Plan.Plan absent those statutory limitations. A participant is vested in his or her Savings PlanMake-up Account to the extent that he or she is vested in the Retirement Savings Plan matching contributions. SERP participants are general, unsecured creditors of the company.Company.

Retiree Health Care Spending Accounts. A RHCSA account will be provided to Mr. Fortnum and Ms. CastellanoZallie provided his or her employment with the companyCompany is terminated by retirement at or after age 55 with ten years of service. The RHCSA accounts provide assistance in purchasingpre-age 65 retiree medical and dental coverage from the company

Company and to reimburse for a Medicare supplement policy for coverage at age 65 or older. At termination, qualified employees have access to a RHCSA account for themselves and a RHCSA account in an equal amount for their then qualified dependents. The balances in these accounts may be used by thepre-age 65 retiree and dependents to purchase from the company,Company, at the company’sCompany’s full cost, the medical and dental benefits provided by the companyCompany to active employees.

The balances in these notional accounts are forfeited if the employee terminates employment prior to age 55 and ten years of service at the time of termination. The accounts otherwise terminate on the death of the employee for the employee’s RHCSA and upon the death of the qualified dependent in the case of his or her RHCSA.

Mr. Zallie as a former employee of National Starch LLC was entitled to medical coverage with reduced premiums that mirrored the active health plan prior to age 65 if he retired after age 55 with ten or more years of continuous service or he attained age 65 after terminating employment due to total disability. If he retired after age 55 with ten or more years of continuous service or he attained age 65 after terminating employment due to total disability, he and his spouse (after attaining age 65) would each have been entitled to up to $1,500 per year to be spent on specified Medicare supplement medical and prescription drug plans selected by the company. These benefits were replaced with a RHCSA account effective January 1, 2015.

Recent Plan Changes.The following plan changes were effective December 31, 2016:

Executive Life Insurance Plan. Mr. Fortnum and eleven other current U.S., salaried employees participate in our Executive Life Insurance Plan. This is a legacy plan which was established by our former parent company

before we became an independent public company, and all of the insurance policies were purchased by our former parent company. This plan and plan benefits are frozen, and we will not offer this benefit to any employees who do not already participate in it. This is a split-dollar life insurance plan which provides the participant with a greater death benefit than provided under our basic life insurance plan. Additionally, at the later of age 65 or 15 years from the purchase of a policy included in this plan, participants are given full ownership of the life insurance policies. Participants’ annual premiums are calculated to be the amount sufficient to pay for the cost of the life insurance being provided.

We make payments to the participating named executive officer in the amount of the participant premiums under the Executive Life Insurance Plan and will continue to do so after his expected June 30, 2017 retirement from the company. We also make payments to this named executive officer in the amount of taxes due as a result of such payments.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits:Benefits. We provide our named executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that we believe are reasonable and appropriate because they help make our compensation packages competitive and better enable the companyCompany to attract and retain executives for key positions and are not excessive.

We provideDuring 2019, we provided each named executive officer with an automobile. Weannual car allowance of $15,000 except for (i) Mr. Zallie, who was provided with a Company automobile, (ii) Mr. Kokke, who switched from a car allowance to a Company provided automobile on October 4, 2019, and, accordingly, received $11,875, and (iii) Ms. Bawcom, who received a prorated annual car allowance of $10,625 based upon her start date with the Company. For those receiving a Company automobile, we lease and pay all the costs of operating these automobiles, including insurance for the U.S.-resident named executive officers. Each of the named executive officers is subject to income tax on the imputed income resulting from his or her benefit.benefit, but the named executive officers are responsible for any imputed taxes. Each of the U.S.-based named executive officers also receives financial planning and tax preparation services, the value of which constitutes taxable income to the recipient.recipient, which is also the recipient’s responsibility.

The values of these perquisites are included in the Fiscal 2019 Summary Compensation Table in the column headed “All Other Compensation.”

Change in Control Agreements. We have a severance agreement with each of theour currently employed named executive officers that requires us or a successor company to make certain payments and provide certain benefits if the named executive officer’s employment is terminated by us or the successor company other than because of death, “Disability” or “Cause,” or is terminated by the named executive officer for “Good Reason,” in each case, within two years after a change in control of the company.Company. Disability, Cause and Good Reason are defined in these severance agreements. These agreements are intended to encourage retention in the face of an actual or rumored change in control. In addition, these agreements are intended to align executives’ and shareholders’stockholders’ interests by enabling executives to consider corporate transactions that are in the best interests of the shareholdersstockholders and other constituents of the companyCompany without undue concern over whether the transactions may jeopardize the executives’named executive officers’ own employment. Because these agreements are provided to satisfy different objectives than our regular compensation program, decisions made under this program do not affect our regular compensation program.

The terms of these agreements are similar to those provided by other companies, and we provide them in part because we believe we need to do so to provide a competitive compensation package. Information regarding potential payments under these agreements for the named executive officers is provided under the heading“Estimated “Estimated Potential Payments upon Change in Control” on page 53.56.

Leadership Transition

Effective January 1, 2016, James P. Zallie was given responsibility for the South America region in addition to his responsibility for the North America region, in his new role as Executive Vice President, Global Specialties and President, Americas. Ricardo de Abreu Souza, who retired from the company in February 2016 and had served as Senior Vice President and President, South America Ingredient Solutions through December 31, 2015, had previously been responsible for the South America region.

Executive Stock Ownership Requirements

We maintain stock ownership requirements for our named executive officers. The ownership requirements are six times herhis current annual base salary for our Chief Executive Officer and three times their annual base salaries for each of the other named executive officers. We count direct and indirect ownership of our common

stock, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and phantom stock units, but do not include stock options or unvested performance shares in determining whether the ownership requirements are satisfied. Named executive officers are expected to attain their ownership targets within five years from the time the targets become applicable. Named executive officers are not permitted to sell shares of common stock other than to fund the payment of the exercise price of stock options or to fund the payment of taxes upon the exercise of stock options or vesting of performance shares, restricted stock units or shares of restricted stock at any time when they have not attained their ownership targets. In 2019, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to permit Ms. Adefioye to make aone-time sale of certain shares which she owned prior to becoming an executive officer of the Company. As of December 31, 2016,2019, all of our named executive officers either exceeded their stock ownership targets or were within the five-year compliance window in which to meet those ownership targets.

Other Items

Timing of Stock Option Grants

Our Compensation Committee reviews and approves management’s recommendations for option grants annually. This occurs during the first Compensation Committee meeting of the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee approves grants of stock options to named executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, at the same time they are granted to all other eligible employees. The independent directors approve grants of stock options to the Chief Executive Officer. We do not time such grants in coordination with the company’sCompany’s possession or release of material,non-public or other information. Meetings of the Compensation Committee are generally scheduled at least a year in advance.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a $1 million limit on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation paid to the company’s Chief Executive Officer or any of the company’s four other executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, whose compensation is required to be disclosed in this proxy statement by reason of their being among the most highly compensated officers for the taxable year and who are employed by the company as of the end of the year. This limitation does not apply to compensation that meets the requirements under Section 162(m) for “qualifying performance-based” compensation (i.e., compensation paid only if the individual’s performance meetspre-established objective goals based on performance criteria approved by shareholders). For 2016, the grants of stock options and restricted stock units, the payments under the Annual Incentive Plan and the performance share awards were designed to satisfy the requirements for deductible compensation. However, we may decide to paynon-deductible variable compensation. In addition, salaries are not considered performance-based compensation under Section 162(m); therefore, a portion of our Chief Executive Officer’s salary is not tax deductible by us. Because a 2006 amendment to SEC regulations requires that we disclose our Chief Financial Officer’s compensation in our proxy statement whether or not he or she is one of our four most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, Section 162(m) does not limit our deduction for compensation paid to our Chief Financial Officer.

Compensation Recovery Policy

Effective January 1, 2014, the Board of Directors adopted a recoupment or “clawback” policy for cash and equity incentive awards paid to executive officers. The policy provides that in the event there is a restatement of incorrect financial results, the Compensation Committee in its discretion will seek reimbursement of the incremental portion of awards paid to executive officers in excess of the awards that would have been paid based on the restated financial results. All forms of incentive compensation are subject to this policy. The Compensation Committee may look back over the three-year period prior to the restatement for the recoupment and may lookrecoup compensation paid to both current and former

executives. In addition, the policy provides the Compensation Committee the discretion to recoup amounts of excess incentive compensation paid to any executive officer in conjunction with any incorrect financial results (even if not resulting in a restatement), or misconduct on the part of the officer, constituting fraud, commission of a felony, material violation of any written agreement with or policies of the company,Company, or any other material breach of fiduciary duty injurious to the company.Company. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are subject to any clawbacks that may be required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies

Effective February 4, 2014,The Company’s Insider Trading Compliance Policy includes, among other items, a provision that prohibits the company adopted an Anti-HedgingCompany’s directors and Anti-Pledging Policy. The policy prohibits our executive officers and directors from (a) hedging the risk of ownership in companythe Company’s stock and incentive awards and (b) except in limited circumstances, pledging shares of companythe Company’s stock as collateral for a loan or other obligation.

Corporate Governance Highlights

The Compensation Committee is briefed regularly on best practicesanti-hedging and corporate governance developments in relation to executive compensation. Our executive compensation policies and practices include:

Fiscal 2019 Summary Compensation Table

The following narrative, tables and footnotes describe the total compensation earned by our named executive officers for 2014, 20152017, 2018, and 2016.2019. The components of the total compensation reported in the Fiscal

2019 Summary Compensation Table are described below. For information on the role of each component within the total compensation package, refer to the description under“Compensation “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 26.32.

Salary. This column represents the base salary earned during 2014, 20152017, 2018, and 20162019 and includes any amounts deferred under our Retirement Savings Plan and SERP.

Bonus. No bonuses were paid in 2014, 2015 or 2016.

Stock Awards. This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of performance shares and restricted stock units granted in the current and prior years, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (FASB ASC Topic 718). Additional information regarding the awards is set forth in the“Grants “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2016”2019” table on page 4549 and the“Outstanding “Outstanding Equity Awards at 20162019 FiscalYear-End” table on page 46.50. The assumptions used in determining the fair value of the awards are set forth in the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on FormForm 10-K for each respective year covered by the Fiscal 2019 Summary Compensation Table (notes 2 and 12 in the reports for 2017 and 2018 and notes 2 and 11 in the report for 2014 and notes 2 and 12 in the reports for 2015 and 2016)2019). We caution that the actual amounts ultimately realized from the disclosed performance share awards and restricted stock units will likely vary from the disclosed amounts based on a number of factors, including the amounts of the actual awards, our actual operating performance, stock price fluctuations, differences from the valuation assumptions used and the timing of exercise or applicable vesting. The actual value the named executive officer receives will depend on the number of shares earned and the price of a share of our common stock when the shares vest. Because the accounting valuation for the performance share awards is calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, the target value utilized by the Compensation Committee to determine the number of performance shares to grant differs slightly from the valuation used for accounting purposes.

Option Awards. This column represents the grant date fair value of stock option awards granted in the current and prior years, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Additional information regarding the awards is set forth in the“Grants “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2016”2019” table on page 4549 and the“Outstanding “Outstanding Equity Awards at 20162019 FiscalYear-End” table on page 46.50. The assumptions used in determining the fair value of the awards are set forth in the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on FormForm 10-K for each respective year covered by the Fiscal 2019 Summary Compensation Table (notes 2 and 12 in the reports for 2017 and 2018 and notes 2 and 11 in the report for 2014 and notes 2 and 12 in the reports for 2015 and 2016)2019). We caution that the actual amounts ultimately realized by the named executive officers from the disclosed option awards will likely vary based on a number of factors, including our actual operating performance, stock price fluctuations, differences from the valuation assumptions used and the timing of exercise or applicable vesting. Because we consider vesting restrictions and forfeiture assumptions to determine the grant date fair value of stock option awards, the target value utilized by the Compensation Committee to determine the number of stock options to grant differs slightly from the valuation used for accounting purposes and disclosed in this column. Stock options granted in 2014, 20152017, 2018, and 20162019 vest in three equal installments on the first three anniversaries of their dates of grant.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. This column represents cash awards earned under our Annual Incentive Plan, which is discussed in further detail beginning on page 3137 under“Compensation “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 26.32.

Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings. This column represents the aggregate actuarial increase in the present value of benefits under all of our pension plans. The amounts were determined by using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in our consolidated financial statements.

All Other Compensation. Consistent with our emphasis on performance-based pay, perquisites and other compensation are limited in scope and are primarily comprised of retirement benefit contributions, allowances and company-provided automobiles.

Fiscal 2019 Summary Compensation Table